Is Usury Still a Sin? Thomas Aquinas on the Justice and Injustice of Moneylending

Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association:261-269 (Forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines Thomas Aquinas’s condemnation of usury. In the first section, the details of Thomas’s teaching are examined with special attention to the so-called “extrinsic titles” discussed in the Middle Ages as qualifications of the moral and legal strictures concerning moneylending. The reminder of the paper examines the particular extrinsic title of Lucrum Cessans (compensation for lost profit), which Thomas rejects, and attempts to square that rejection with other texts implying that compensation for lost profit is a requirement of justice when taken outside the context of moneylending. The paper concludes with some possible modern applications of Thomas’s position.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Thomas on the Parts of "Justice".Hsiao-Huei Pan - 2004 - Philosophy and Culture 31 (3):109-134.
Justice as a Virtue: A Thomistic Perspective by Jean Porter.Jeffrey Hause - 2018 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 56 (2):366-367.
Theorizing Justice: Critical Insights and Future Directions.Krushil Watene & Jay Drydyk (eds.) - 2016 - New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.
Thomas Aquinas on the Miracle of Christ's Incarnation.Qing-dao Zeng - 2009 - Philosophy and Culture 36 (3):117-127.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-16

Downloads
50 (#320,996)

6 months
8 (#373,162)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references