Abstract
A recent literature applies economic reasoning to restrict corporate social responsibility (CSR) to profitable opportunities. The underlying theory of the firmassumes widespread public company ownership and a net positive contribution to social welfare in relatively unfettered markets. This modern economic approach posits strict fiduciary responsibility of agents. Management, in this fiduciary role, should have no CSR discretion beyond the requirements of minimalist laws and customary ethics. Any profitable CSR option can be undertaken. Any unprofitable CSR action is defined as discretionary altruism prohibited to fiduciary agents and recommended against for shareowners acting through the corporate form. The modern economic position shifts all unprofitable social issues into the sphere of public policy—which is then influenced by business on the basis of economic self-interest. There are two points of relaxation in this position. First, a firm may need to practice prudential altruism to forestall more costly action by governments and stakeholders. Second, management must consider productivity effects of employee sentiments about social issues and stakeholders
Keywords Business and Professional Ethics  Conference Proceedings  Social Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 978-0-9763264-4-1
DOI iabsproc20061745
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,077
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 41 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Practicing the Business of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Process Perspective.Christa Thomsen & Jakob Lauring - 2008 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 4 (2):117.
Corporate Social Responsibility: Theory and Evidence.Paul C. Godfrey, Nile A. Hatch & Jared M. Hansen - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:112-117.
An Organizing Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility Theories.Duane Windsor - 2011 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 22:151-162.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-09-18

Total views
24 ( #457,268 of 2,454,567 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,377 of 2,454,567 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes