Synthese 198 (4):3949-3977 (2019)
AbstractIn 1902 there arrived in Jena a letter from Russell laying out a proof that shattered Frege’s confidence in logicism, which is widely taken to be the doctrine according to which every truth of arithmetic is re-expressible without relevant loss as a provable truth about a purely logical object. Frege was persuaded that Russell had exposed a pathology in logicism, which faced him with the task of examining its symptoms, diagnosing its cause, assessing its seriousness, arriving at a treatment option, and making an estimate of future prospects. The symptom was the contradiction that had crept into naïve set theory in the form of the set that provably is and is not its own member. The diagnosis was that it is caused by Basic Law V of the Grundgesetze. Triage answers the question, “How bad is it?” The answer was that the contradiction irreparably destroys the logicist project. The treatment option was nil. The disease was untreatable. In due course, the prognosis turned out to be that a scaled-down Fregean logic could have an honourable life as a theory inference for various domains of mathematical discourse, but not for domains containing the logical objects required for logicism. Since there aren’t such objects, there aren’t such domains. On the face of it, Frege’s logicist collapse is astonishing. Why wouldn’t he have repaired the fault in Law V and gone back to the business of bringing logicism to an assured realization? In the course of our reflections, we will have nice occasion to consider the good it might have done Frege to have booked some time with Aristotle had he been able to. By the time we’re finished, we’ll have cause to think that in the end the Russell might well have begged the question against Frege.
Similar books and articles
Neo-Logicism and Russell’s Logicism.Kevin C. Klement - 2012 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 32 (2):159.
Why Did Frege Reject the Theory of Types?Wim Vanrie - 2021 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 29 (3):517-536.
Russell’s Notes on Frege’s Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, From §53.Bernard Linsky - 2006 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 26 (2).
Russell's Notes on Frege for Appendix A of The Principles of Mathematics.Bernard Linsky - 2004 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 24 (2):133-172.
Formal Arithmetic Before Grundgesetze.Richard Kimberly Heck - 2019 - In Philip A. Ebert & Marcus Rossberg (eds.), Essays on Frege's Basic Laws of Arithmetic. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 497-537.
The Truth and Nothing but the Truth, yet Never the Whole Truth: Frege, Russell and the Analysis of Unities.Graham Stevens - 2003 - History and Philosophy of Logic 24 (3):221-240.
Frege, Russell and Logicism: A Logical Reconstruction.Nino Cocchiarella - 1986 - In L. Haaparanta & J. Hintikka (eds.), Frege Synthesized. D. Reidel Publishing Co.. pp. 197--252.
Russell And Frege On The Logic of Functions.Bernard Linsky - 2008 - The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 4:1-17.
The Logicism of Frege, Dedekind, and Russell.William Demopoulos & Peter Clark - 2005 - In Stewart Shapiro (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic. Oxford University Press. pp. 129--165.
Russell's Paradox in Appendix B of the Principles of Mathematics : Was Frege's Response Adequate?Kevin C. Klement - 2001 - History and Philosophy of Logic 22 (1):13-28.
Logicism and the Philosophy of Language: Selections From Frege and Russell.Arthur Sullivan (ed.) - 2003 - Broadview Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Just Following the Rules: Collapse / Incoherence Problems in Ethics, Epistemology, and Argumentation Theory.Patrick Bondy - 2020 - In J. Anthony Blair & Christopher Tindale (eds.), Rigour and Reason: Essays in Honour of Hans Vilhelm Hansen. Windsor, ON, Canada: pp. 172-202.
References found in this work
The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays.Frank Plumpton Ramsey - 1925 - London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Begriffsschrift: Eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens.Gottlob Frege - 1879 - Halle a.d.S.: Louis Nebert.
Grundlagen der Arithmetik: Studienausgabe MIT Dem Text der Centenarausgabe.Gottlob Frege - 1884 - Breslau: Wilhelm Koebner Verlag.
The Nature of Mathematical Knowledge.Philip Kitcher - 1983 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik: Eine Logische Mathematische Untersuchung Über den Begriff der Zahl.Gottlob Frege - 1988 - Felix Meiner Verlag.