Why did Einstein's programme supersede lorentz's? (I)

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):95-123 (1973)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjps/24.2.95

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Why did Einstein's programme supersede lorentz's? (II).Elie Zahar - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (3):223-262.
Did Einstein's programme supersede lorentz's?S. J. Prokhovnik - 1974 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (4):336-340.
Method and appraisal in the physical sciences: the critical background to modern science, 1800-1905.Colin Howson (ed.) - 1976 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Elie Zahar, Einstein's Revolution. [REVIEW]Niall Shanks - 1990 - Philosophy in Review 10 (1):42-44.
Einstein's Revolution: A Study in Heuristic. Elie Zahar.Robert DiSalle - 1990 - Isis 81 (4):809-810.
Einstein's Revolution: A Study in Heuristic by Elie Zahar. [REVIEW]Robert Disalle - 1990 - Isis 81:809-810.
Review of Imre Lakatos, John Worrall and Elie Zahar: Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery. [REVIEW]W. V. Quine - 1977 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 28 (1):81-82.
Could Lakatos, even with Zahar's criterion for novel fact, evaluate the copernican research programme?Neil Thomason - 1992 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (2):161-200.
Mechanisms, principles, and Lorentz's cautious realism.Mathias Frisch - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36 (4):659-679.
The Non-equivalence of Einstein and Lorentz.Clara Bradley - 2021 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72 (4):1039-1059.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
41 (#400,450)

6 months
378 (#5,039)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Rationality of Science.W. Newton-Smith - 1981 - Boston: Routledge.
Why the ultimate argument for scientific realism ultimately fails.Moti Mizrahi - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):132-138.
Logical versus historical theories of confirmation.Alan Musgrave - 1974 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):1-23.

View all 134 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references