Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Heidegger’s Categories in Being and Time.Robert Brandom - 1983 - The Monist 66 (3):387-409.
    In Division One of Being and Time Heidegger presents a novel categorization of what there is, and an original account of the project of ontology and consequently of the nature and genesis of those ontological categories. He officially recognizes two categories of Being: Zuhandensein and Vorhandensein. Vorhandene things are roughly the objective, person-independent, causally interacting subjects of natural scientific inquiry. Zuhandene things are those which a neo-Kantian would describe as having been imbued with human values and significances. In addition to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  • Truth in philosophy.Barry Allen - 1993 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    " Barry Allen shows what truth has come to mean in the philosophical tradition, what is wrong with many of the ways of conceiving truth, and why philosophers ...
  • Objectivity, relativism, and truth.Richard Rorty - 1991 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
    In this volume Rorty offers a Deweyan account of objectivity as intersubjectivity, one that drops claims about universal validity and instead focuses on utility for the purposes of a community. The sense in which the natural sciences are exemplary for inquiry is explicated in terms of the moral virtues of scientific communities rather than in terms of a special scientific method. The volume concludes with reflections on the relation of social democratic politics to philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   248 citations  
  • Representation, social practise, and truth.Richard Rorty - 1988 - Philosophical Studies 54 (2):215 - 228.
  • Relativism, Context, and Truth.Mark B. Okrent - 1984 - The Monist 67 (3):341-358.
    Recently there has been a revival of philosophic interest in, and discussion of, ‘relativism’. Debates concerning relativism, however, tend to have an odd air of unreality. It is odd that while most everyone wants to refute relativism, just about no one wants to be identified as a relativist. There is even a tendency to use ‘relativist’ as an epithet of abuse. But, if relativism is universally acknowledged to be refuted, even self-refuting, then why is there so much discussion of it, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Coherence, Justification, and Truth.Michael Williams - 1980 - Review of Metaphysics 34 (2):243 - 272.
    THE central idea of modern empiricism has been that, if there is to be such a thing as justification at all, empirical knowledge must be seen as resting on experiential "foundations." To claim that knowledge rests on foundations is to claim that there is a privileged class of beliefs the members of which are "intrinsically credible" or "directly evident" and which are able, therefore, to serve as ultimate terminating points for chains of justification. An important development in current epistemology has (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations