5 found
Order:
  1.  28
    Inhibition of DNA synthesis facilitates expansion of low‐complexity repeats.Andrei Kuzminov - 2013 - Bioessays 35 (4):306-313.
  2.  4
    Hypothesis. RuvA, RuvB and RuvC proteins: Cleaning‐up after recombinational repairs in E. coli.Andrei Kuzminov - 1993 - Bioessays 15 (5):355-358.
    After the completion of RecA protein‐mediated recombinational repair of daughter‐strand gaps in E. coli, participating chromosomes are held together by Holliday junctions. Until recently, it was not known how the cell disengages the connected chromosomes. Accumulating genetic data suggested that the product of the ruv locus participates in recombinational repair and acts after the formation of Holliday junctions. Molecular characterization of the locus revealed that there are three genes – ruvA, ruvB and ruvC; mutations in any one of the genes (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  9
    Half‐Intercalation Stabilizes Slipped Mispairing and Explains Genome Vulnerability to Frameshift Mutagenesis by Endogenous “Molecular Bookmarks”.Andrei Kuzminov - 2019 - Bioessays 41 (9):1900062.
    Some 60 years ago chemicals that intercalate between base pairs of duplex DNA were found to amplify frameshift mutagenesis. Surprisingly, the robust induction of frameshifts by intercalators still lacks a mechanistic model, leaving this classic phenomenon annoyingly intractable. A promising idea of asymmetric half‐intercalation‐stabilizing frameshift intermediates during DNA synthesis has never been developed into a model. Instead, researchers of frameshift mutagenesis embraced the powerful slipped‐mispairing concept that unexpectedly struggled with the role of intercalators in frameshifting. It is proposed that the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  15
    Instability of inhibited replication forks in E. coli.Andrei Kuzminov - 1995 - Bioessays 17 (8):733-741.
    Inhibiting the progress of replication forks in E. coli makes them susceptible to breakage. Broken replication forks are evidently reassembled by the RecBCD recombinational repair pathway. These findings explain a particular pattern of DNA degradation during inhibition of chromosomal replication, the role of recombination in the viability of mutants with displaced replication origin, and hyper‐recombination observed in the Terminus of the E. coli chromosome in rnh mutants. Breakage and repair of inhibited replication forks could be the reason for the recombination‐dependence (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  4
    Unraveling the late stages of recombinational repair: Metabolism of DNA junctions in Escherichia coli.Andrei Kuzminov - 1996 - Bioessays 18 (9):757-765.
    DNA junctions are by‐products of recombinational repair, during which a damaged DNA sequence, assisted by RecA filament, invades an intact homologous DNA to form a joint molecule. The junctions are three‐strand or four‐strand depending on how many single DNA strands participate in joint molecules. In E. coli, at least two independent pathways to remove the junctions are proposed to operate. One is via RuvAB‐promoted migration of four‐strand junctions with their subsequent resolution by RuvC. In vivo, RuvAB and RuvC enzymes might (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark