Order:
See also
Karl Egerton
University of Hertfordshire
  1.  38
    It Takes More Than Moore to Answer Existence-Questions.Karl Egerton - forthcoming - Erkenntnis:1-12.
    Several recent discussions of metaphysics disavow existence-questions, claiming that they are metaphysically uninteresting because trivially settled in the affirmative by Moorean facts. This is often given as a reason to focus metaphysical debate instead on questions of grounding. I argue that the strategy employed to undermine existence-questions fails against its usual target: Quineanism. The Quinean can protest that the formulation given of their position is a straw man: properly understood, as a project of explication, Quinean metaphysics does not counsel us (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  38
    Getting Off the Inwagen: A Critique of Quinean Metaontology.Karl Egerton - 2016 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 4 (6).
    Much contemporary ontological inquiry takes place within the so-called ‘Quinean tradition’ but, given that some aspects of Quine’s project have been widely abandoned even by those who consider themselves Quineans, it is unclear what this amounts to. Fortunately recent work in metaontology has produced two relevant results here: a clearer characterisation of the metaontology uniting the aforementioned Quineans, most notably undertaken by Peter van Inwagen, and a raft of criticisms of that metaontology. In this paper I critique van Inwagen’s Quinean (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  3.  47
    Found Guilty by Association: In Defence of the Quinean Criterion.Karl Egerton - 2018 - Ratio 31 (1):37-56.
    Much recent work in metaontology challenges the so-called ‘Quinean tradition’ in metaphysics. Especially prominently, Amie Thomasson argues for a highly permissive ontology over ontologies which eliminate many entities. I am concerned with disputing not her ontological claim, but the methodology behind her rejection of eliminativism – I focus on ordinary objects. Thomasson thinks that by endorsing the Quinean criterion of ontological commitment eliminativism goes wrong; a theory eschewing quantification over a kind may nonetheless be committed to its existence. I argue (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  20
    Ontology After Carnap Edited by Stephan Blatti and Sandra Lapointe Oxford University Press, 2016, Pp. 241, £45 ISBN: 9780199661985. [REVIEW]Karl Egerton - 2017 - Philosophy 92 (1):135-142.
  5.  39
    Existence: Essays in Ontology. By Peter van Inwagen. Cambridge University Press, 2014, Pp. 261, £18.99 ISBN: 9781107625266. [REVIEW]Karl Egerton - 2015 - Philosophy 90 (3):519-524.
  6.  20
    God’s Not Dead But Reason Might Be.Charlotte Knowles & Karl Egerton - 2017 - The Philosophers' Magazine 76:9-15.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  9
    The Death of Moritz Schlick.Karl Egerton - 2016 - The Philosophers' Magazine 74:39-44.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark