5 found
Order:
  1.  9
    Intention and Suggestion in the Abhidharmakśa: Sandhābhā $$\Underset{\Raise0.3em\Hbox{$\Smash{\Scriptscriptstyle\Cdot}$}}{s}$$ Ārevisited. [REVIEW]Michael M. Broido - 1985 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 13 (4):327-381.
    At Abhidharmakośa VI .3, Vasubandhu analyses the phrase sandhāya ... bha $$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} $$ ita $$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} $$ as used in the sūtras. Here bhā $$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} $$ ita $$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} $$ mentions an utterance, to which a figurative sense is ascribed by the gerundive (not noun) sandhāya. The audience is split: some are intended to understand the literal, others the figurative sense. Vasubandhu's analysis works well for sandhābhā $$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} $$ a etc. in the Saddharmapu $$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}$$ $$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{d}$$ arīka and the Guhyasamājatantra. (The Hevajratantra is (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  2.  37
    Abhiprāya and Implication in Tibetan Linguistics.Michael M. Broido - 1984 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 12 (1):1-33.
  3.  12
    Intention and Suggestion in the Abhidharmakśa: Sandhābhā\ Underset {\ Raise0. 3em\ Hbox {Ārevisited. [REVIEW]Michael M. Broido - 1985 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 13 (4):327-381.
    At Abhidharmakośa VI .3, Vasubandhu analyses the phrase sandhāya ... bha $$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} $$ ita $$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} $$ as used in the sūtras. Here bhā $$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} $$ ita $$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} $$ mentions an utterance, to which a figurative sense is ascribed by the gerundive (not noun) sandhāya. The audience is split: some are intended to understand the literal, others the figurative sense. Vasubandhu's analysis works well for sandhābhā $$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} $$ a etc. in the Saddharmapu $$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}$$ $$\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{d}$$ arīka and the Guhyasamājatantra. (The Hevajratantra is (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4.  37
    Veridical and Delusive Cognition: Tsong-Kha-Pa on the Two Satyas. [REVIEW]Michael M. Broido - 1988 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 16 (1):29-63.
  5. Intention and Suggestion in the Abhidharmakśa: Sandhābhā $\Underset{\Raise0.3em\Hbox{$\Underset{\Raise0.3em\Hbox{\Smash{\Scriptscriptstyle\Cdot}$}}{s}$}}{s} " />Ārevisited. [REVIEW]Michael M. Broido - 1985 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 13 (4).
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark