Order:
  1. Ein sehr wunderliches Ding, sehr wunderlich dargestellt: die transzendentale Apperzeption bei Kant, Fichte und Schopenhauer.Peter Welsen - 1997 - Schopenhauer Jahrbuch 78:31-61.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  28
    Schopenhauer's Interpretation of the Categorical Imperative.Peter Welsen - 2005 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 61 (3/4):757 - 772.
    The systematic relevance of the arguments Schopenhauer directs against Kant's categorical imperative has hardly been discussed in detail so far. As the difference between Kant's and Schopenhauer's moral philosophy amounts to the opposition between practical reason and sympathy, it is anything but surprising that it is reflected by Schopenhauer's objections. Schopenhauer tries to show that practical reason - be it in its pure or empirical form - is altogether incapable of furnishing a solid basis for ethics. To assess the import (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Schopenhauer and Kant.Peter Welsen - 2005 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 61 (3):757-772.
    The systematic relevance of the arguments Schopenhauer directs against Kant's categorical imperative has hardly been discussed in detail so far. As the difference between Kant's and Schopenhauer's moral philosophy amounts to the opposition between practical reason and sympathy, it is anything but surprising that it is reflected by Schopenhauer's objections. Schopenhauer tries to show is that practical reason be it in its pure or empirical form is altogether incapable of furnishing a solid basis for ethics. To assess the import of (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  8
    Schopenhauer – Critique de la causalité kantienne.Peter Welsen - 2016 - Philosophia Scientiæ 20:47-58.
    D’après Schopenhauer, Kant commet deux erreurs dans sa théorie de la causalité : 1) Schopenhauer reproche à Kant d’appliquer la catégorie de causalité à la chose en soi, ce qui est en effet incompatible avec sa thèse selon laquelle les catégories valent uniquement pour le monde comme représentation et non pas pour la chose en soi. Si, en outre, la chose en soi était une entité inconnue, on pourrait dire – conformément à Schopenhauer – qu’elle n’est pas capable d’« affecter (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  3
    Schopenhauer – Critique de la Causalité kantienneSchopenhauer’s Criticism of Kantian Causality.Peter Welsen - 2016 - Philosophia Scientae 20:47-58.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  2
    Principes de justice et sens de justice.Peter Welsen - 2006 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 2 (2):217-228.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. Schopenhauers Kritik der praktischen Vernunft.Peter Welsen - 1999 - Schopenhauer Jahrbuch 80:87-107.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark