Managing Informal Mathematical Knowledge: Techniques from Informal Logic

Abstract
Much work in MKM depends on the application of formal logic to mathematics. However, much mathematical knowledge is informal. Luckily, formal logic only represents one tradition in logic, specifically the modeling of inference in terms of logical form. Many inferences cannot be captured in this manner. The study of such inferences is still within the domain of logic, and is sometimes called informal logic. This paper explores some of the benefits informal logic may have for the management of informal mathematical knowledge.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,357
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA
    Andrew Aberdein (2009). Mathematics and Argumentation. Foundations of Science 14 (1-2):1-8.
    Similar books and articles
    Y. Rav (1999). Why Do We Prove Theorems? Philosophia Mathematica 7 (1):5-41.
    Andrew Aberdein (2007). Fallacies in Mathematics. Proceedings of the British Society for Research Into Learning Mathematics 27 (3):1-6.
    Robert Baum (1975). Logic. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-08-05

    Total downloads

    10 ( #120,359 of 1,088,428 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #69,601 of 1,088,428 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.