Why Patronize Feminists? A Reply to Stove on Mill

Philosophy 68 (265):397 - 400 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0031819100041309

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Stove on the rationality of induction and the uniformity thesis.Michael Rowan - 1993 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (3):561-566.
On Stove on Mill on Women.Inari Thiel - 1994 - Philosophy 69 (267):100 - 101.
Reply to mr. stove's reply.J. W. N. Watkins - 1960 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 38 (1):54 – 58.
The Subjection of John Stuart Mill.David Stove - 1993 - Philosophy 68 (263):5 - 13.
The intellectual capacity of David stove.Jenny Teichman - 2001 - Philosophy 76 (1):149-157.
On an Interpretation of Mill’s Qualitative Utilitarianism.Christoph Schmidt-Petri - 2006 - Prolegomena 5 (2):165-177.
A reply to mr. Watkins.D. C. Stove - 1960 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 38 (1):51 – 54.
An Argument By Stove Against Inductive Scepticism.Andrew Pickin - 2006 - Dissertation, University of Cambridge
Political writings.James Mill - 1992 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Terence Ball.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
19 (#783,934)

6 months
7 (#416,569)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bob Brecher
University of Brighton

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Subjection of John Stuart Mill.David Stove - 1993 - Philosophy 68 (263):5 - 13.

Add more references