Graduate studies at Western
Critical Review 7 (2-3):407-421 (1993)
|Abstract||Our response to Davidson is two?pronged. First, we dispute the basis for his dismissal of Austrian economics as presented by O'Driscoll and Rizzo. In particular, we reject his claim, dictated entirely by his Post Keynesian perspective, concerning an ?identical axiomatic foundation? of Austrian and neoclassical economics. Second, we seek to show that Davidson's criticism of neoclassicism (and by implication of Austrianism) is based on a superficial, incorrect, and outmoded reading of neoclassical economics.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Paul Davidson (1989). The Economics of Ignorance or Ignorance of Economics? Critical Review 3 (3-4):467-487.
Christopher Torr (1993). >What Can Austrian Economists Learn From the Post Keynesians? Reply to Davidson. Critical Review 7 (2-3):399-406.
Jochen Runde (1993). Paul Davidson and the Austrians: Reply to Davidson. Critical Review 7 (2-3):381-397.
Paul Davidson (1993). Austrians and Post Keynesians on Economic Reality: Rejoinder to Critics. Critical Review 7 (2-3):423-444.
David L. Prychitko (1993). After Davidson, Who Needs the Austrians? Reply to Davidson. Critical Review 7 (2-3):371-380.
Daniel D. Hutto (1998). Davidson's Identity Crisis. Dialectica 52 (1):45-61.
Julian Fink (2011). Are All Actions Movements of the Agent's Body? Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 24:52-64.
Donald Davidson (1993). Reply to Eva Picardi's First-Person Authority and Radical Interpretation. In Ralf Stoecker (ed.), Reflecting Davidson: Donald Davidson Responding to an International Forum of Philosophers (Foundations of Communication). Hawthorne: De Gruyter.
Ralf Stoecker (ed.) (1993). Reflecting Davidson: Donald Davidson Responding to an International Forum of Philosophers. W. De Gruyter.
Thomas Mayer (1998). Boettke's Austrian Critique of Mainstream Economics: An Empiricist's Response. Critical Review 12 (1-2):151-171.
Michael V. Antony (2003). Davidson's Argument for Monism. Synthese 135 (1):1-12.
Roger F. Gibson (1994). Quine and Davidson: Two Naturalized Epistemologists. Inquiry 37 (4):449 – 463.
Simone Gozzano (1999). Davidson on Rationality and Irrationality. In Mario de Caro (ed.), Interpretations and Causes: New Perspectives on Donald Davidson's Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Pub.
David M. Armstrong (1975). Beliefs and Desires as Causes of Actions: A Reply to Donald Davidson. Philosophical Papers 4 (May):1-7.
Erik Stenius (1976). Comments on Donald Davidson's Paper Radical Interpretation. Dialectica 30:35-60.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-10-18
Total downloads1 ( #294,309 of 755,029 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,372 of 755,029 )
How can I increase my downloads?