- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Replies [Book Review]
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (1):189-204 (1997)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Review: Précis of Making It Explicit. [REVIEW]Robert Brandom - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (1):153 - 156.
Genuine Normativity, Expressive Bootstrapping, and Normative Phenomenalism.David Lauer - 2009 - Etica and Politica / Ethics & Politics 11 (1):321-350.
From truth to semantics: A path through "making it explicit".Bob Brandom - 1997 - Philosophical Issues 8:141-154.
Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment.Robert Brandom - 1994 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Representation or Inference: Must We Choose? Should We?Michael Kremer - 2010 - In Bernhard Weiss & Jeremy Wanderer (eds.), Reading Brandom: On Making It Explicit. Routledge. pp. 227.
Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning.Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.) - 2011 - De Gruyter Mouton.
Articulating reasons: an introduction to inferentialism.Robert Brandom - 2000 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Précis of Insensitive Semantics. [REVIEW]Herman Cappelen & Ernie Lepore - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (2):425–434.
‚Was Ist Begründung?’ Schwierigkeiten durch den Primat der Pragmatik vor der Semantik am Beispiel des Erlanger/konstanzer Konstruktivismus.Mechtild Jäger - 2001 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 32 (1):167-192.
Meaning, Interpretation.Martin Stokhof - 2002 - In D. Beaver & P. Scotto di Luzio (eds.), Words, Proofs, and Diagrams. CSLI Publications. pp. 217-240.
Reading Brandom: on making it explicit.Bernhard Weiss & Jeremy Wanderer (eds.) - 2010 - New York: Routledge.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-01-09
Downloads
96 (#179,702)
6 months
2 (#1,198,779)
2011-01-09
Downloads
96 (#179,702)
6 months
2 (#1,198,779)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
A Kantian-Brandomian View of Concepts and The Problem of a Regress of Norms.Byeong D. Lee - 2019 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 27 (4):528-543.
Normative Phenomenalism: On Robert Brandom's Practice‐Based Explanation of Meaning.Ronald Loeffler - 2005 - European Journal of Philosophy 13 (1):32-69.
Ginsborg on a Kantian-Brandomian View of Concepts.Byeong D. Lee - 2020 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 28 (1):56-74.
Between primitivism and naturalism: Brandom’s theory of meaning.Daniel Whiting - 2006 - Acta Analytica 21 (3):3-22.
Liberal Naturalism and Second-Personal Space: A Neo-Pragmatist Response to “The Natural Origins of Content”.David Macarthur - 2015 - Philosophia 43 (3):565-578.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-wg6s5 uwo