ISCT, Hypernorms, and Business: A Reinterpretation [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 88 (4):645 - 658 (2009)
|Abstract||Numerous universal standards have been proposed to provide ethical guidance for the actions of business. The result has been a confusing mix of standards and their defenses. Thus, there is widespread recognition that business requires a common framework to provide ethical guidance. One of the most prominent conceptual frameworks recently offered, which addresses issues of international business ethics, is that of integrative social contracts theory (ISCT) developed by Thomas Donaldson and Thomas Dunfee. By integrating normative and empirical matters, and drawing on the concepts of social contracts and hypernorms, ISCT seeks to provide a workable, comprehensive theory of business ethics. In this article I argue that, in fact, ISCT offers two different views of hypemorms and the theoretical structure surrounding them. A Principlist View that understands hypernorms as the most general, universal moral principles that hold moral sway over all microsocial contracts. A Contextualist View is that hypernorms are not special, additional norms, but refer to a certain status that the most general norms or principles of each community achieve that are part of a convergence with the norms of other societies. I maintain that the Contextualist View offers a plausible view of ISCT while avoiding many of the criticisms that have been made against the Principlist interpretation of ISCT. Further, the Contextualist View suggests other areas in which ISCT needs further development, such as in the area of human rights which I also briefly explore|
|Keywords||social contract integrative social contracts theory moral free space hypernorms stakeholder theory Donaldson Dunfee human rights|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Rodney Stevenson (2003). Exploring the Ethics and Economics of Global Labor Standards. Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (2):193-220.
John Dienhart (2009). Principles of Managerial Moral Responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (4):529-552.
R. Edward Freeman & Jared D. Harris (2009). Creating Ties That Bind. Journal of Business Ethics 88:685 - 692.
Robert A. Phillips & Michael E. Johnson-Cramer (2006). Ties That Unwind: Dynamism in Integrative Social Contracts Theory. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 68 (3):283 - 302.
Dirk Ulrich Gilbert & Michael Behnam (2009). Advancing Integrative Social Contracts Theory: A Habermasian Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 89 (2):215 - 234.
Anita Cava (1995). Social Contract Theory and Gender Discrimination. Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (2):257-270.
Thomas Donaldson (2009). Compass and Dead Reckoning: The Dynamic Implications of ISCT. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 88 (4):659 - 664.
Mark Douglas (2000). Integrative Social Contracts Theory: Hype Over Hypernorms. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 26 (2):101 - 110.
Bryan W. Husted (1999). A Critique of the Empirical Methods of Integrative Social Contracts Theory. Journal of Business Ethics 20 (3):227 - 235.
Thomas W. Dunfee (2006). A Critical Perspective of Integrative Social Contracts Theory: Recurring Criticisms and Next Generation Research Topics. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 68 (3):303 - 328.
Added to index2009-12-28
Total downloads5 ( #170,177 of 739,352 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,352 )
How can I increase my downloads?