David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Military Ethics 3 (2):161-177 (2004)
This essay explores Kant's writings on war and peace, and concentrates on the thesis that Kant has a just war theory. It strives to explain what the substance of that theory is, and finds that it differs in several respects from that offered by the just war tradition. Many scholars suspect that Kant has no just war theory. Effort is made to overturn this conventional understanding: first by showing, negatively, that Kant does not subscribe to the two main rival doctrines on the issue, namely, realism and pacifism; and second by demonstrating, positively, how the core propositions of just war theory are consistent with Kant's basic moral and political principles. Interpretive reconstruction then reveals the full substance of Kant's just war theory, which is divided into accounts of jus ad bellum, jus in bello and jus post bellum. Kant's jus post bellum reflections remain his most deep, original and relevant in this regard
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Marcus Schulzke (2012). Kant's Categorical Imperative, the Value of Respect, and the Treatment of Women. Journal of Military Ethics 11 (1):26-41.
Similar books and articles
Jeff McMahan (2004). The Ethics of Killing in War. Ethics 114 (4):693-733.
M. Evans (2012). Just War, Democracy, Democratic Peace. European Journal of Political Theory 11 (2):191-208.
Mark Evans (2009). Moral Responsibilities and the Conflicting Demands of Jus Post Bellum. Ethics and International Affairs 23 (2):147-164.
Manuela Melandri (2011). The State, Human Rights and the Ethics of War Termination: What Should a Just Peace Look Like? A Critical Appraisal. Journal of Global Ethics 7 (3):241-249.
Joseph Betz (2005). Proportionality, Just War Theory, and America's 2003–2004 War Against Iraq. Social Philosophy Today 21:137-156.
D. Boucher (2012). The Just War Tradition and its Modern Legacy: Jus Ad Bellum and Jus in Bello. European Journal of Political Theory 11 (2):92-111.
Lawrence Masek (2002). All's Not Fair in War: How Kant's Just War Theory Refutes War Realism. Public Affairs Quarterly 16 (2):143-154.
Toby Handfield & Patrick Emerton (2009). Order and Affray: Defensive Privileges in Warfare. Philosophy and Public Affairs 37 (4):382 - 414.
Graham Parsons (2012). The Incoherence of Walzer's Just War Theory. Social Theory and Practice 38 (4):663-88.
Christopher Toner (2010). The Logical Structure of Just War Theory. Journal of Ethics 14 (2):81-102.
Leonard Kahn (2013). Just War Theory and Cyber-Attacks. In Fritz Alhoff, Nicholas Evans & Adam Henschke (eds.), Not Just Wars. Routledge.
Larry May (2012). After War Ends: A Philosophical Perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Torkel Brekke (ed.) (2006). The Ethics of War in Asian Civilizations: A Comparative Perspective. Routledge.
Karsten J. Struhl (2006). Can There Be a Just War? Radical Philosophy Today 2006:3-25.
Brian Orend (2001). A Just-War Critique of Realism and Pacifism. Journal of Philosophical Research 26:435-477.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads53 ( #43,710 of 1,696,586 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #95,693 of 1,696,586 )
How can I increase my downloads?