Peoples or Person?: Revising Rawls on Global Justice

Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 27:1-97 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Argues that the reasons Rawls offers in The Law of Peoples for rejecting cosmopolitanism are unpersuasive and that Rawls's resistance to cosmopolitanism is associated with other problematic features of his approach, including his stance regarding justice in warfare; an individualist, cosmopolitan approach would resolve evident difficulties in Rawls's position.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Political Liberalism, Constructivism, and Global Justice.Alexander Kaufman - 2013 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (5):621-1.
A Just Global Economy: In Defense of Rawls.David A. Reidy - 2007 - The Journal of Ethics 11 (2):193-236.
Cosmopolitan Justice and Equalizing Opportunities.Simon Caney - 2001 - Metaphilosophy 32 (1-2):113-134.
Recent Work on Rawls's Law of Peoples: Critics versus Defenders.Gillian Brock - 2010 - American Philosophical Quarterly 47 (1):85.
Justice and the Global Economy in Rawls’s the Law of Peoples.David Reidy - 2004 - Southwest Philosophy Review 20 (1):241-255.
John Rawls: Towards a Just World Order.Patrick Hayden - 2002 - University of Wales Press.
Principles or imagination? Two approaches to global justice.Mark Coeckelbergh - 2007 - Journal of Global Ethics 3 (2):203 – 221.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-26

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gary Chartier
La Sierra University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references