The referring function of statements: reply to Dirk Greimann

Manuscrito 27 (1):87-94 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In §1 I discuss the pragmatic and semantic objections that Dirk raises against the claim that sentences refer to states of affairs. In §2 I explain in which sense I maintain that true sentences identify states of affairs

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is Frege's Julius caesar problem?Dirk Greimann - 2003 - Dialectica 57 (3):261-278.
Frege's horizontal and the liar-paradox.Dirk Greimann - 2003 - Manuscrito 26 (2):359-387.
Ist Kants Ethik ontologisch unschuldig?Dirk Greimann - 2004 - Kant Studien 95 (1):107-127.
Grundriss einer sprechaktanalytischen Theorie der Wahrheit.Dirk Greimann - 2002 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 56 (2):191 - 219.
Functional explanation in biology.Hugh Lehman - 1965 - Philosophy of Science 32 (1):1-20.
Frege's puzzle about the cognitive function of truth.Dirk Greimann - 2004 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 47 (5):425-442.
Alethic Statements Are Not Intensional.Ari Maunu - 2006 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):53-61.
Zum Realitätsbereich der Semantik: Skizze einer Theorie der "Semantischen Verpflichtung".Dirk Greimann - 2003 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 57 (2):188 - 210.
How tarskian is Frege?Joan Weiner - 2008 - Mind 117 (466):427-450.
Number words and reference to numbers.Katharina Felka - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 168 (1):261-282.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-12

Downloads
7 (#1,384,540)

6 months
1 (#1,467,486)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references