- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Imitating Quantum Probabilities: Beyond Bell’s Theorem and Tsirelson Bounds
Foundations of Science:1-25 (forthcoming)
Abstract
Local hidden-variable model of singlet-state correlations discussed in Czachor is shown to be a particular case of an infinite hierarchy of local hidden-variable models based on an infinite hierarchy of calculi. Violation of Bell-type inequalities can be interpreted as a ‘confusion of languages’ problem, a result of mixing different but neighboring levels of the hierarchy. Mixing of non-neighboring levels results in violations beyond the Tsirelson bounds.My notes
Similar books and articles
Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Probabilities, and Superdeterminism.Eddy Keming Chen - 2022 - In Eleanor Knox & Alastair Wilson (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Physics. London, UK: Routledge.
Philosophical Implications of Bell's Theorem.Niall Shanks - 1987 - Dissertation, University of Alberta (Canada)
Lessons of Bell's Theorem: Nonlocality, yes; Action at a distance, not necessarily.Wayne C. Myrvold - 2016 - In Mary Bell & Shan Gao (eds.), Quantum Nonlocality and Reality: 50 Years of Bell's Theorem. Cambridge University Press. pp. 238-260.
Oversights in the Respective Theorems of von Neumann and Bell are Homologous.Joy Christian - manuscript
Three-Slit Experiments and Quantum Nonlocality.Gerd Niestegge - 2013 - Foundations of Physics 43 (6):805-812.
Hidden Variables and Incompatible Observables in Quantum Mechanics.Benjamin Feintzeig - 2015 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (4):905-927.
Non-Local Realistic Theories and the Scope of the Bell Theorem.Federico Laudisa - 2008 - Foundations of Physics 38 (12):1110-1132.
A Physical Approach to Tsirelson’s Problem.M. Navascués, T. Cooney, D. Pérez-García & N. Villanueva - 2012 - Foundations of Physics 42 (8):985-995.
Interpretation of the quantum formalism and Bell's theorem.Emilio Santos - 1991 - Foundations of Physics 21 (2):221-241.
Bell’s Theorem, Realism, and Locality.Peter Lewis - 2019 - In Alberto Cordero (ed.), Philosophers Look at Quantum Mechanics. Springer Verlag.
Bell’s Theorem without Inequalities and without Unspeakable Information.Adán Cabello - 2005 - Foundations of Physics 35 (11):1927-1934.
Communication Complexity as a Principle of Quantum Mechanics.Adán Cabello - 2006 - Foundations of Physics 36 (4):512-525.
Analytics
Added to PP
2022-07-14
Downloads
17 (#865,183)
6 months
8 (#353,767)
2022-07-14
Downloads
17 (#865,183)
6 months
8 (#353,767)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Bell-Type Inequalities from the Perspective of Non-Newtonian Calculus.Michał Piotr Piłat - forthcoming - Foundations of Science:1-17.
References found in this work
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky & Nathan Rosen - 1935 - Physical Review (47):777-780.
On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox.J. S. Bell - 2004 - In John Stewart Bell (ed.), Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics: collected papers on quantum philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 14--21.
A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of ‘Hidden’ Variables, I and II.David Bohm - 1952 - Physical Review (85):166-193.
A Loophole of All ‘Loophole-Free’ Bell-Type Theorems.Marek Czachor - 2020 - Foundations of Science 25 (4):971-985.
Non-Newtonian Mathematics Instead of Non-Newtonian Physics: Dark Matter and Dark Energy from a Mismatch of Arithmetics.Marek Czachor - 2020 - Foundations of Science 26 (1):75-95.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-wg6s5 uwo