Graduate studies at Western
Ethics and Information Technology 5 (4):183-190 (2003)
|Abstract||This paper considers the moralresponsibility of computer scientists withrespect to weapons development in post-911America. It does so by looking at the doctrineof jus in bello as exemplified in fourscenarios. It argues that the traditionaldoctrine should be augmented by a number ofprinciples, including the Principle of aMorally Obligatory Smart Arms Race, thePrinciple of Assistance to One's Enemies, thePrinciple of Public Debate on Weapons of MassDisruption, and the Principle of the MoralUnjustifiability of Private Wars.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Herman T. Tavani, Frances S. Grodzinsky & Richard A. Spinello (2003). Computer Ethics in the Post-September 11 World. Ethics and Information Technology 5 (4):181-182.
Jeff McMahan (2004). The Ethics of Killing in War. Ethics 114 (4):693-733.
Doug McCready (2009). Ending the War Right: Jus Post Bellum and the Just War Tradition. Journal of Military Ethics 8 (1):66-78.
Darrell Cole (2011). War and Intention. Journal of Military Ethics 10 (3):174-191.
Aaron Fichtelberg (2006). Applying the Rules of Just War Theory to Engineers in the Arms Industry. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (4):685-700.
Eric Patterson (2010). Ethics and US Af-Pak Policy. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (1):31-46.
Mark Evans (2009). Moral Responsibilities and the Conflicting Demands of Jus Post Bellum. Ethics and International Affairs 23 (2):147-164.
Manuela Melandri (2011). The State, Human Rights and the Ethics of War Termination: What Should a Just Peace Look Like? A Critical Appraisal. Journal of Global Ethics 7 (3):241-249.
Brian Orend (2004). Kant's Ethics of War and Peace. Journal of Military Ethics 3 (2):161-177.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #154,923 of 739,395 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?