David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 41 (1):85-112 (2010)
Inheritance and variation were a major focus of Charles Darwin’s studies. Small inherited variations were at the core of his theory of organic evolution by means of natural selection. He put forward a developmental theory of heredity (pangenesis) based on the assumption of the existence of material hereditary particles. However, unlike his proposition of natural selection as a new mechanism for evolutionary change, Darwin’s highly speculative and contradictory hypotheses on heredity were unfruitful for further research. They attempted to explain many complex biological phenomena at the same time, disregarded the then modern developments in cell theory, and were, moreover, faithful to the widespread conceptions of blending and so-called Lamarckian inheritance. In contrast, Mendel’s approaches, despite the fact that features of his ideas were later not found to be tenable, proved successful as the basis for the development of modern genetics. Mendel took the study of the transmission of traits and its causes (genetics) out of natural history; by reducing complexity to simple particulate models, he transformed it into a scientific field of research. His scientific approach and concept of discrete elements (which later gave rise to the notion of discrete genes) also contributed crucially to the explanation of the existence of stable variations as the basis for natural selection. Â© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010
|Keywords||Variations Discreteness Gradualism Statistical laws Chance Blending inheritance Soft inheritance Pangenesis Mendel Darwin|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Charles Darwin (2008). On the Origin of Species: By Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. Sterling Pub..
Eva Jablonka & Marion Lamb (2000). Epigenetic Inheritance and Evolution: The Lamarckian Dimension. Oxford University Press Uk.
Michael Ruse (1999). Monad to Man: The Concept of Progress in Evolutionary Biology. Journal of the History of Biology 32 (1):197-204.
Charles Darwin (1883). The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Peter Bowler (2008). What Darwin Disturbed: The Biology That Might Have Been. Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 99:560-567.
Citations of this work BETA
Rony Armon (2010). Beyond Darwinism's Eclipse: Functional Evolution, Biochemical Recapitulation and Spencerian Emergence in the 1920s and 1930s. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 41 (1):173 - 194.
Rony Armon (2010). Beyond Darwinism’s Eclipse: Functional Evolution, Biochemical Recapitulation and Spencerian Emergence in the 1920s and 1930s. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 41 (1):173-194.
Similar books and articles
Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther (2000). Darwin on Variation and Heredity. Journal of the History of Biology 33 (3):425-455.
Peter Godfrey-Smith (2007). Conditions for Evolution by Natural Selection. Journal of Philosophy 104 (10):489-516.
Mary Jane West‐Eberhard (2008). Toward a Modern Revival of Darwin's Theory of Evolutionary Novelty. Philosophy of Science 75 (5):899-908.
Jerry Fodor (2008). Against Darwinism. Mind and Language 23 (1):1–24.
Edward S. Reed (1978). Darwin's Evolutionary Philosophy: The Laws of Change. Acta Biotheoretica 27 (3-4):201-235.
Floyd V. Monaghan & Alain F. Corcos (1990). The Real Objective of Mendel's Paper. Biology and Philosophy 5 (3):267-292.
Roger J. Wood & Vítězslav Orel (2005). Scientific Breeding in Central Europe During the Early Nineteenth Century: Background to Mendel's Later Work. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 38 (2):239 - 272.
Michael Bulmer (1999). The Development of Francis Galton's Ideas on the Mechanism of Heredity. Journal of the History of Biology 32 (2):263 - 292.
Kostas Kampourakis (2013). Mendel and the Path to Genetics: Portraying Science as a Social Process. [REVIEW] Science and Education 22 (2):293-324.
Added to index2010-06-12
Total downloads27 ( #176,247 of 1,932,455 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #456,114 of 1,932,455 )
How can I increase my downloads?