Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (3):295-307 (2011)
|Abstract||Opt-out systems of postmortal organ procurement are often referred to as ‘presumed consent’ systems. A presumption directs us, in a case in which no compelling evidence is available to hold that P, nevertheless to proceed as if P were true, unless there is sufficient evidence that it is false. It is recommended to presume consent in this case, because, in the absence of registered objections of the deceased, it is held to be more probable that she consented than that she did not. Whether this suggestion makes sense, however, turns out to depend on the proper interpretation of the concept of ‘consent’. On a mental state conception of consent we are allowed to presume it if we have reason to suppose the deceased to have been in favour of donation. However, we should rather understand consent to be a public action of authorisation. On that view consent cannot be presumed, and the opt-out systems as we presently know them on the European continent and elsewhere do not satisfy the requirement that the deceased should have consented to the removal of his organs|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael B. Gill (2004). Presumed Consent, Autonomy, and Organ Donation. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (1):37 – 59.
Govert den Hartogh (2012). The Role of the Relatives in Opt-in Systems of Postmortal Organ Procurement. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (2):195-205.
M. Potts, J. L. Verheijde, M. Y. Rady & D. W. Evans (2010). Normative Consent and Presumed Consent for Organ Donation: A Critique. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (8):498-499.
Muhammad M. Hammami, Hunaida M. Abdulhameed, Kristine A. Concepcion, Abdullah Eissa, Sumaya Hammami, Hala Amer, Abdelraheem Ahmed & Eman Al-Gaai (2012). Consenting Options for Posthumous Organ Donation: Presumed Consent and Incentives Are Not Favored. [REVIEW] BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):32-.
James J. Delaney, Dunleavy Hall, David B. Hershenov & Park Hall (2010). The Metaphysical Basis of a Liberal Organ Procurement Policy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (4):303-315.
Rebecca Collins (2005). Posthumous Reproduction and the Presumption Against Consent in Cases of Death Caused by Sudden Trauma. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (4):431 – 442.
Caroline Guibet Lafaye & Henri Kreis (2013). From Altruistic Donation to Conditional Societal Organ Appropriation After Death. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (2):355-368.
William A. Edmundson (2011). Consent and Its Cousins. Ethics 121:335-53.
Deborah Bowman (2011). Informed Consent: A Primer for Clinical Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Sigrid Sterckx & Kristof van Assche (2011). The New Belgian Law on Biobanks: Some Comments From an Ethical Perspective. Health Care Analysis 19 (3):247-258.
Govert Hartogh (2011). In the Best Interests of the Deceased: A Possible Justification for Organ Removal Without Consent? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (4):259-269.
Eric Chwang (2009). A Defense of Subsequent Consent. Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (1):117-131.
Shaun D. Pattinson (2009). Consent and Informational Responsibility. Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (3):176-179.
Sandra Woien, Mohamad Rady, Joseph Verheijde & Joan McGregor (2006). Organ Procurement Organizations Internet Enrollment for Organ Donation: Abandoning Informed Consent. [REVIEW] BMC Medical Ethics 7 (14):1-9.
Barbara K. Pierscionek (2008). What is Presumed When We Presume Consent? BMC Medical Ethics 9 (1):8.
Added to index2011-03-05
Total downloads30 ( #46,628 of 755,778 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,433 of 755,778 )
How can I increase my downloads?