David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
A generic quantification, like dogs have tails, has a distinctive semantics; it is certainly not synonymous with the universal quantification all dogs have tails. A generic causal claim, like smoking causes cancer, is similarly not synonymous with all smoking causes cancer. Many philosophers of science have taken this difference in meaning to demand radical treatments of causal generics, invoking such exotica as causation between properties or causation at ‘different levels’. A more sober treatment is possible, making use of a..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul Bloom (2007). Developmental Changes in the Understanding of Generics. Cognition 105 (1):166-183.
Kathrin Koslicki (1999). Genericity and Logical Form. Mind and Language 14 (4):441–467.
Alyssa Ney (2009). Physical Causation and Difference-Making. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (4):737-764.
Greg N. Carlson (1979). Generics and Atemporalwhen. Linguistics and Philosophy 3 (1):49 - 98.
Andrei Cimpian, Amanda C. Brandone & Susan A. Gelman (2010). Generic Statements Require Little Evidence for Acceptance but Have Powerful Implications. Cognitive Science 34 (8):1452-1482.
Barbara F. Csima, Rod Downey, Noam Greenberg, Denis R. Hirschfeldt & Joseph S. Miller (2006). Every 1-Generic Computes a Properly 1-Generic. Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (4):1385 - 1393.
Added to index2010-04-25
Total downloads342 ( #3,228 of 1,780,078 )
Recent downloads (6 months)124 ( #4,717 of 1,780,078 )
How can I increase my downloads?