David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Education 18 (2):177-189 (2009)
This paper considers George A. Reisch’s account of the role of Cold War political forces in shaping the apolitical stance that came to dominate philosophy of science in the late 1940s and 1950s. It argues that at least as early as the 1930s, Logical Empiricists such as Rudolf Carnap already held that philosophy of science could not properly have political aims, and further suggests that political forces alone cannot explain this view’s rise to dominance during the Cold War, since political forces cannot explain why a philosophy of science with liberal democratic, anti-communist aims did not flourish. The paper then argues that if professionalization is understood in the right way, it might point toward an explanation of the apolitical stance of Cold War philosophy of science.
|Keywords||Logical Empiricism Rudolf Carnap George Reisch Cold War Professionalization|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Heather Douglas (2010). Engagement for Progress: Applied Philosophy of Science in Context. Synthese 177 (3):317-335.
Similar books and articles
George A. Reisch (2005). How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science: To the Icy Slopes of Logic. Cambridge University Press.
George A. Reisch (1991). Did Kuhn Kill Logical Empiricism? Philosophy of Science 58 (2):264-277.
Moritz Schlick, Rudolf Carnap, Otto Neurath & Sahotra Sarkar (eds.) (1996). Logical Empiricism at its Peak: Schlick, Carnap, and Neurath. Garland Pub..
Jonathan Y. Tsou (2007). Review of George A. Reisch, How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science. [REVIEW] British Journal for the History of Science 40 (1):153-155.
George A. Reisch (1998). Pluralism, Logical Empiricism, and the Problem of Pseudoscience. Philosophy of Science 65 (2):333-348.
Thomas Uebel (2013). “Logical Positivism”—“Logical Empiricism”: What's in a Name? Perspectives on Science 21 (1):58-99.
Sahotra Sarkar (ed.) (1996). Decline and Obsolescence of Logical Empiricism: Carnap Vs. Quine and the Critics. Garland Pub..
Steve Fuller (2006). Review Essay: The Philosophical Buck Stops Here. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (3):355-366.
George A. Reisch (2001). Against a Third Dogma of Logical Empiricism: Otto Neurath and "Unpredictability in Principle". International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15 (2):199 – 209.
Kathleen Okruhlik (2004). Logical Empiricism, Feminism, and Neurath's Auxiliary Motive. Hypatia 19 (1):48-72.
John Capps (2006). Review: George Reisch. How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. [REVIEW] Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (1):167-171.
Alan W. Richardson (1998). Carnap's Construction of the World: The Aufbau and the Emergence of Logical Empiricism. Cambridge University Press.
Sahotra Sarkar (ed.) (1996). The Emergence of Logical Empiricism: From 1900 to the Vienna Circle. Garland Publishing.
Thomas Mormann (2007). Carnap's Logical Empiricism, Values, and American Pragmatism. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 38 (1):127 - 146.
Added to index2011-02-19
Total downloads290 ( #2,794 of 1,725,417 )
Recent downloads (6 months)40 ( #28,948 of 1,725,417 )
How can I increase my downloads?