Between Ramus, Alexander of Aphrodisias and Averroes. Francesco Vimercato’s Commentary to Book Twelve of Aristotle’s Metaphysics

Peitho 3 (1):211-230 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What kind of causality does the Aristotelian Prime Mover exert on the heaven? Who “loves” the Prime Mover? Renaissance peripatetic philosopher, Francesco Vimercato, a “royal” teacher of “Greek and Latin philosophy” in Paris during the forties and the fifties of the 16th century tried to resolve these traditional puzzles that resulted from the exegesis of the Metaphysics XII, 6–7. His solution appears to be innovative, if compared to the ancient and the medieval ones. It seems partially to prefigure the last two decades’ interpretations of Aristotelian “theology”.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Aristotle's Metaphysics. Alexander & Alexander of Aphrodisias - 1989 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. Edited by W. E. Dooley & Arthur Madigan.
Philosophy of Intellect and Vision in the De anima and De intellectu of Alexander of Aphrodisias.John Shannon Hendrix - 2010 - School of Architecture, Art, and Historic Preservation Faculty Publications.
On Ideas—Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato’s Theory of Forms.Jonathan Barnes - 1996 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (2):489-491.
Santo Tomás y el motor inmóvil.David Torrijos Castrillejo - 2011 - Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval 18:123-136.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-06

Downloads
4 (#1,619,724)

6 months
1 (#1,462,504)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?