Graduate studies at Western
Synthese 150 (2):281-325 (2006)
|Abstract||The orthodox view in the study of representation is that a strictly third-person objective methodology must be employed. The acceptance of this methodology is shown to be a fundamental and debilitating error. Toward this end I defend what I call.|
|Keywords||Content First Person Intention Metaphysics Methodology Representation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Charles W. Harvey (2007). Comments on Nicholas Georgalis's “First-Person Methodologies: A View From Outside the Phenomenological Tradition”. Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (S1):113-120.
Christophe Menant, Evolution as Connecting First-Person and Third-Person Perspectives of Consciousness (2008).
Gualtiero Piccinini (2010). How to Improve on Heterophenomenology: The Self-Measurement Methodology of First-Person Data. Journal of Consciousness Studies 17 (3-4):3 - 4.
Robert van Gulick (1982). Mental Representation: A Functionalist View. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 63 (January):3-20.
Thomas Metzinger (2003). Phenomenal Transparency and Cognitive Self-Reference. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2 (4):353-393.
Uriah Kriegel (2012). Personal-Level Representation. Protosociology 28:77-114.
Albert Newen & Kai Vogeley (2003). Self-Representation: Searching for a Neural Signature of Self-Consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 12 (4):529-543.
Nicholas Georgalis (2007). First-Person Methodologies: A View From Outside the Phenomenological Tradition. Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (S1):93-112.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads53 ( #23,204 of 739,482 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,616 of 739,482 )
How can I increase my downloads?