David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Basic Income Studies 3 (3) (2008)
I argue that, in the currently gender-unjust societies a basic income would not advance feminist goals. To assess the impact of a social policy on gender justice I propose the following criterion: a society is gender-just when the costs of engaging in a lifestyle characterized by gender-symmetry (in both the domestic and public spheres) are, for both men and women, smaller or equal to the costs of engaging in a gender-asymmetrical lifestyle. For a significant number of women, a basic income would increase the costs of leading gender-symmetrical lifestyles because it would make it easier for both women and men to pursue gender-unjust preferences. I argue that preference satisfaction is distinct from justice. I conclude by showing why a basic income would lead to further privatisation of caregiving, and I outline the negative effects this would have on women.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Anca Gheaus & Ingrid Robeyns (2011). Equality-Promoting Parental Leave. Journal of Social Philosophy 42 (2):173-191.
Similar books and articles
Janne Chung & Viswanath Umashanker Trivedi (2003). The Effect of Friendly Persuasion and Gender on Tax Compliance Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 47 (2):133 - 145.
J. Wallach Scott (2010). Gender: Still a Useful Category of Analysis? Diogenes 57 (1):7-14.
Mari Mikkola (2011). Ontological Commitments, Sex and Gender. In Charlotte Witt (ed.), Feminist Metaphysics. Springer. 67--83.
John A. Robertson (2001). Preconception Gender Selection. American Journal of Bioethics 1 (1):2 – 9.
Robin May Schott (1996). Gender and "Postmodern War". Hypatia 11 (4):19 - 29.
Lucinda Joy Peach (2002). Social Responsibility, Sex Change, and Salvation: Gender Justice in the "Lotus Sūtra". Philosophy East and West 52 (1):50-74.
T. V. Barchunova (2003). The Selfish Gender, or the Reproduction of Gender Asymmetry in Gender Studies. Studies in East European Thought 55 (1):3-25.
Mari Mikkola (2006). Elizabeth Spelman, Gender Realism, and Women. Hypatia 21 (4):77-96.
Naila Kabeer (2012). Empowerment, Citizenship and Gender Justice: A Contribution to Locally Grounded Theories of Change in Women's Lives. Ethics and Social Welfare 6 (3):216-232.
Charlotte Witt (2011). What Is Gender Essentialism?. In. In , Feminist Metaphysics. Springer Verlag. 11--25.
Jane S. Upin (1992). Applying the Concept of Gender: Unsettled Questions. Hypatia 7 (3):180 - 187.
Lois McNay (2000). Gender and Agency: Reconfiguring the Subject in Feminist and Social Theory. Blackwell Publishers.
Julie A. Nelson (1992). Thinking About Gender. Hypatia 7 (3):138 - 154.
Catherine Kirchmeyer (2002). Gender Differences in Managerial Careers: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 37 (1):5 - 24.
Added to index2010-10-06
Total downloads26 ( #68,072 of 1,102,773 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #61,871 of 1,102,773 )
How can I increase my downloads?