Impugning Randomness, Convincingly

Studia Logica 100 (1-2):193-222 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

John organized a state lottery and his wife won the main prize. You may feel that the event of her winning wasn’t particularly random, but how would you argue that in a fair court of law? Traditional probability theory does not even have the notion of random events. Algorithmic information theory does, but it is not applicable to real-world scenarios like the lottery one. We attempt to rectify that

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-02-08

Downloads
83 (#202,419)

6 months
7 (#428,584)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations