Studia Logica 41 (2-3):159 - 171 (1982)
|Abstract||Intuitionists and classical logicians use in common a large number of the logical axioms, even though they supposedly mean different things by the logical connectives and quantifiers — conquans for short. But Wittgenstein says The meaning of a word is its use in the language. We prove that in a definite sense the intuitionistic axioms do indeed characterize the logical conquans, both for the intuitionist and the classical logician.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Stephen Crain & Drew Khlentzos (2010). The Logic Instinct. Mind and Language 25 (1):30-65.
Matthew W. McKeon (2010). The Concept of Logical Consequence: An Introduction to Philosophical Logic. Peter Lang Pub..
Vann Mcgee (2001). Truth by Default. Philosophia Mathematica 9 (1):5-20.
Marc Pauly (2008). On the Role of Language in Social Choice Theory. Synthese 163 (2):227 - 243.
Floy Andrews Doull (1991). Leibniz's Logical System of 1686-1690. Theoria 6 (1):9-28.
Charles Sayward (2006). What is the Logic of Propositional Identity? Logic and Logical Philosophy 15 (1):3-15.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #46,310 of 722,700 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,779 of 722,700 )
How can I increase my downloads?