David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (4):447-462 (1997)
This paper discusses collaborative learning and its use in an elective course on ethics in engineering. Collaborative learning is a form of active learning in which students learn with and from one another in small groups. The benefits of collaborative learning include improved student performance and enthusiasm for learning, development of communication skills, and greater student appreciation of the importance of judgment and collaboration in solving real-world problems such as those encountered in engineering ethics. Collaborative learning strategies employed in the course include informal small group discussions/problem solving, role-playing exercises, and cooperative student group projects, including peer grading. Student response to these techniques has been highly favorable. Realizing the benefits of collaborative learning is a challenge to both teachers, who must give up some control in the classroom, and students, who must be willing to take greater responsibility for their learning.
|Keywords||engineering ethics collaborative learning cooperative learning role-playing case studies group projects peer grading|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Caroline Whitbeck (1996). Ethics as Design: Doing Justice to Moral Problems. Hastings Center Report 26 (3):9-16.
Patricia H. Werhane (1991). Engineers and Management: The Challenge of the Challenger Incident. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 10 (8):605 - 616.
Citations of this work BETA
José A. Cruz & William J. Frey (2003). An Effective Strategy for Integrating Ethics Across the Curriculum in Engineering: An ABET 2000 Challenge. Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (4):543-568.
Wolfgang J. Liebert (2013). Preparing to Understand and Use Science in the Real World: Interdisciplinary Study Concentrations at the Technical University of Darmstadt. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (4):1533-1550.
Bradley J. Brummel, C. K. Gunsalus, Kerri L. Anderson & Michael C. Loui (2010). Development of Role-Play Scenarios for Teaching Responsible Conduct of Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (3):573-589.
Olivia Walling (2015). Beyond Ethical Frameworks: Using Moral Experimentation in the Engineering Ethics Classroom. Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (6):1637-1656.
Similar books and articles
Sevasti-Melissa Nolas (2006). Learning as Support for Organizational Innovation: Possibilities and Limitations. World Futures 62 (3):240 – 260.
Joan E. Sieber (2005). Misconceptions and Realities About Teaching Online. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):329-340.
Gerry Stahl (2000). Collaborative Information Environments to Support Knowledge Construction by Communities. AI and Society 14 (1):71-97.
John Kohls (1996). Student Experiences with Service Learning in a Business Ethics Course. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (1):45 - 57.
Nagarjuna G. (2009). Collaborative Creation of Teaching-Learning Sequences and an Atlas of Knowledge. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal Online 3 (N3):23-40.
E. Alpay (2013). Student-Inspired Activities for the Teaching and Learning of Engineering Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (4):1455-1468.
A. Takala & K. Korhonen-Yrjänheikki (2013). A National Collaboration Process: Finnish Engineering Education for the Benefit of People and Environment. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (4):1557-1569.
Nancy Stanlick (2007). Individual-Centered Collaborative Research. Teaching Philosophy 30 (1):85-110.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #466,887 of 1,902,524 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #329,673 of 1,902,524 )
How can I increase my downloads?