Graduate studies at Western
Argumentation 14 (3):261-286 (2000)
|Abstract||Normative pragmatics can bridge the differences between dialectical and rhetorical theories in a way that saves the central insights of both. Normative pragmatics calls attention to how the manifest strategic design of a message produces interpretive effects and interactional consequences. Argumentative analysis of messages should begin with the manifest persuasive rationale they communicate. But not all persuasive inducements should be treated as arguments. Arguments express with a special pragmatic force propositions where those propositions stand in particular inferential relations to one another. Normative pragmatics provides a framework within which varieties of propositional inference and pragmatic force may be kept straight. Normative pragmatics conceptualizes argumentative effectiveness in a way that integrates notions of rhetorical strategy and rhetorical situation with dialectical norms and procedures for reasonable deliberation. Strategic effectiveness should be seen in terms of maximizing the chances that claims and arguments will be reasonably evaluated, whether or not they are accepted. Procedural rationality should be seen in terms of adjustment to the demands of concrete circumstances. Two types of adjustment are illustrated: rhetorical strategies for framing the conditions for dialectical deliberation and rhetorical strategies for making do with limitations to dialectical deliberation|
|Keywords||argumentation dialectic discourse analysis fallacy rhetoric|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jean Goodwin (2000). Comments on `Rhetoric and Dialectic From the Standpoint of Normative Pragmatics'. Argumentation 14 (3):287-292.
Kepa Korta (2002). Pragmatics and Rhetoric for Discourse Analysis: Some Conceptual Remarks. Manuscrito 25 (2).
Matthias Kiesselbach (2011). Constructing Commitment: Brandom's Pragmatist Take on Rule-Following. Philosophical Investigations 35 (2):101-126.
Frans H. Eemeren (2013). In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics. Argumentation 27 (1):49-70.
Frans H. van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser (2000). Rhetorical Analysis Within a Pragma-Dialectical Framework. Argumentation 14 (3):293-305.
Douglas Walton (2012). Computational Dialectic and Rhetorical Invention. AI and Society 26 (1):2011.
Frans H. Eemeren (2012). The Pragma-Dialectical Theory Under Discussion. Argumentation 26 (4):439-457.
Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.) (2007). Pragmatics. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kepa Korta & John Perry (2008). The Pragmatic Circle. Synthese 165 (3):347 - 357.
Gabor Tahin (2011). Rhetorical Heuristics: Probabilistic Strategies in Complex Oratorical Arguments. [REVIEW] Argumentation 25 (1):1-21.
Marco Mazzone (2011). Schemata and Associative Processes in Pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (8):2148-2159.
Esther Romero & Belén Soria (2010). On Phrasal Pragmatics and What is Descriptively Referred To. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 10 (1):63-84.
Added to index2010-09-11
Total downloads10 ( #114,517 of 738,396 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 738,396 )
How can I increase my downloads?