- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The resolution of the confirmation paradox
Australasian Journal of Philosophy 43 (3):359 – 368 (1965)
Abstract
This Article does not have an abstractMy notes
Similar books and articles
An Even Better Solution to the Paradox of the Ravens.James Hawthorne & Branden Fitelson - manuscript
How Bayesian Confirmation Theory Handles the Paradox of the Ravens.Branden Fitelson & James Hawthorne - 2010 - In Ellery Eells & James Fetzer (eds.), The Place of Probability in Science. Springer. pp. 247--275.
An orthodox statistical resolution of the paradox of confirmation.Ronald N. Giere - 1970 - Philosophy of Science 37 (3):354-362.
(C) instances, the relevance criterion, and the paradoxes of confirmation.Phillip J. Rody - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 45 (2):289-302.
Qualitative confirmation and the ravens paradox.Patrick Maher - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):89-108.
Solutions to the paradoxes of confirmation, Goodman's paradox, and two new theories of confirmation.Lin Chao-Tien - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 45 (3):415-419.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
30 (#533,027)
6 months
2 (#1,198,900)
2009-01-28
Downloads
30 (#533,027)
6 months
2 (#1,198,900)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
How Bayesian Confirmation Theory Handles the Paradox of the Ravens.Branden Fitelson & James Hawthorne - 2010 - In Ellery Eells & James Fetzer (eds.), The Place of Probability in Science. Springer. pp. 247--275.
Hempel's Raven paradox: A lacuna in the standard bayesian solution.Peter B. M. Vranas - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (3):545-560.
The Place of Probability in Science: In Honor of Ellery Eells (1953-2006).Ellery Eells & James H. Fetzer (eds.) - 2010 - Springer.
Why Bayesians Needn’t Be Afraid of Observing Many Non-black Non-ravens.Florian F. Schiller - 2012 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (1):77-88.
References found in this work
Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic.Rudolf Carnap - 1947 - Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.
The paradox of confirmation.J. L. Mackie - 1962 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 13 (52):265-277.
Confirmation without background knowledge.J. W. N. Watkins - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (40):318-320.
On the confirmation paradox.P. R. Wilson - 1964 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15 (59):196-199.
A new approach to the confirmation paradox.P. R. Wilson - 1964 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 42 (3):393 – 401.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-b9rvg uwo