Confirmation without background knowledge

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (40):318-320 (1959)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Is the Point of Confirmation?Franz Huber - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1146-1159.
From relative confirmation to real confirmation.Aron Edidin - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (2):265-271.
Cartesian Knowledge and Confirmation.Joel Pust - 2007 - Journal of Philosophy 104 (6):269-289.
The ubiquity of background knowledge.Jaap Kamps - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 84 (1):317-337.
Choosing between confirmation theories.R. G. Swinburne - 1970 - Philosophy of Science 37 (4):602-613.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
77 (#213,945)

6 months
13 (#189,220)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Manipulationism, Ceteris Paribus Laws, and the Bugbear of Background Knowledge.Robert Kowalenko - 2017 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 31 (3):261-283.
Ravens and relevance.Yael Cohen - 1987 - Erkenntnis 26 (2):153 - 179.
The resolution of the confirmation paradox.R. Jardine - 1965 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 43 (3):359 – 368.
A paradox of confirmation.Ruth Weintraub - 1988 - Erkenntnis 29 (2):169 - 180.
Lawson on the Raven paradox and background knowledge.John Watkins - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (4):567-571.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references