Two concepts of tolerance: Or why Bayle is not Locke
Journal of Political Philosophy 4 (4):302–321 (1996)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesD. Anthony LaRivière & Thomas M. Lennon (2002). The History and Significance of Hume's Burning Coal Example. Journal of Philosophical Research 27:511-526.
John Kilcullen (1988). Sincerity and Truth: Essays on Arnauld, Bayle, and Toleration. Oxford University Press.
Michael W. Hickson & Thomas M. Lennon (2009). The Real Significance of Bayle's Authorship of the Avis. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (1):191 – 205.
Robert Paul Wolff (1969). A Critique of Pure Tolerance. Boston, Beacon Press.
Michael W. Hickson (2013). Theodicy and Toleration in Bayle's Dictionary. Journal of the History of Philosophy 51 (1):49-73.
George Khushf (1994). Intolerant Tolerance. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (2):161-181.
Pierre Bayle (2000). Bayle--Political Writings. Cambridge University Press.
Paul Lodge (2002). Leibniz, Bayle, and Locke on Faith and Reason. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (4):575-600.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads33 ( #36,559 of 549,090 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,722 of 549,090 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
