David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of Science 63 (3):374-400 (1996)
This paper examines the problem of founding irreversibility on reversible equations of motion from the point of view of the Brussels school's recent developments in the foundations of quantum statistical mechanics. A detailed critique of both their 'subdynamics' and 'transformation' theory is given. It is argued that the subdynamics approach involves a generalized form of 'coarse-graining' description, whereas, transformation theory cannot lead to truly irreversible processes pointing to a preferred direction of time. It is concluded that the Brussels school's conception of microscopic temporal irreversibility, as such, is tacitly assumed at the macroscopic level. Finally a logical argument is provided which shows, independently of the mathematical formalism of the theory concerned, that statistical reasoning alone is not sufficient to explain the arrow of time
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Robert C. Bishop (2004). Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics Brussels–Austin Style. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 35 (1):1-30.
Vassilios Karakostas (1997). The Conventionality of Simultaneity in the Light of the Spinor Representation of the Lorentz Group. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 28 (2):249-276.
Robert C. Bishop (2004). Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics Brussels–Austin Style. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (1):1-30.
Vassilios Karakostas (1997). The Conventionality of Simultaneity in the Light of the Spinor Representation of the Lorentz Group. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 28 (2):249-276.
Similar books and articles
Étienne Klein (2007). About the Confusion Between the Course of Time and the Arrow of Time. Foundations of Science 12 (3):203-221.
Robert C. Bishop (2005). Quantum Time Arrows, Semigroups and Time-Reversal in Scattering. International Journal of Theoretical Physics:723-733.
Mario Castagnino, Manuel Gadella & Olimpia Lombardi, Time-Reversal Invariance and Irreversibility in Time-Asymmetric Quantum Mechanics.
David Atkinson (2006). Does Quantum Electrodynamics Have an Arrow of Time?☆. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 37 (3):528-541.
Robert Bishop, Brussels-Austin Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics in the Early Years: Similarity Transformations Between Deterministic and Probabilistic Descriptions.
Chuang Liu (1993). The Arrow of Time in Quantum Gravity. Philosophy of Science 60 (4):619-637.
Harald Atmanspacher, Brussels-Austin Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics: Large Poincar´E Systems and Rigged Hilbert Space.
Mario Castagnino, Manuel Gadella & Olimpia Lombardi (2005). Time's Arrow and Irreversibility in Time-Asymmetric Quantum Mechanics. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (3):223 – 243.
Robert C. Bishop (2004). Arrow of Time in Rigged Hilbert Space Quantum Mechanics. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 43:1675-1687.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads68 ( #65,079 of 1,911,917 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #324,434 of 1,911,917 )
How can I increase my downloads?