Integrate, yes, but what and how? A computational approach of sensorimotor fusion in speech

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):364 - 365 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We consider a computational model comparing the possible roles of and in phonetic decoding, demonstrating that these two routes can contain similar information in some communication situations and highlighting situations where their decoding performance differs. We conclude that optimal decoding should involve some sort of fusion of association and simulation in the human brain

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Understanding 'sensorimotor understanding'.Tom Roberts - 2010 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9 (1):101-111.
Artificial Speech and Its Authors.Philip J. Nickel - 2013 - Minds and Machines 23 (4):489-502.
Tensed Mereology.Paul Hovda - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (2):241-283.
Violations of sensorimotor theories of visual experience.Bruce Bridgeman - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):904-905.
Sensorimotor subjectivity and the enactive approach to experience.Evan Thompson - 2005 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (4):407-427.
Merits of a Gibsonian approach to speech perception.Jörgen Pind - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):279-280.
Fusion confusion.David H. Sanford - 2003 - Analysis 63 (1):1–4.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
42 (#377,979)

6 months
12 (#211,554)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references