A Response to “Fragile Objects”

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17 (1):21-23 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a critical response to “Fragile objects: A visual essay,” by Chapman et al. published in the Journal of Bioethical Inquiry : 185-189). Whilst “Fragile objects” is evocative of the author’ experience in sitting with a man, who had been diagnosed with Alzheimer’s, I express concern that there are unwarranted and unsubstantiated conclusions drawn about Patrick’s phenomenological experience of dementia/Alzheimer’s.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,674

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A response to “Fragile objects: a visual essay”.Frank Brennan - 2019 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 16 (2):191-192.
Fragile objects: A visual essay.Michael Chapman, Jennifer Philip, Sally Gardner & Paul Komesaroff - 2019 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 16 (2):185-189.
Three Dogmas of Response-Dependence.Mark Lebar - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 123 (3):175-211.
Korsgaard, Wittgenstein, and the Mafioso.Mark LeBar - 2001 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 39 (2):261-271.
Dispositions.Michael Fara - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Integrity and the Fragile Self.S. Van Hooft - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):451-453.
Objects To Think With.K. Brennan - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (3):313-314.
Thing and object.Kristie Miller - 2008 - Acta Analytica 23 (1):69-89.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-31

Downloads
3 (#1,722,480)

6 months
1 (#1,501,709)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Cui Bono?Michael Ashby & Bronwen Morrell - 2020 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17 (1):1-3.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Fragile objects: A visual essay.Michael Chapman, Jennifer Philip, Sally Gardner & Paul Komesaroff - 2019 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 16 (2):185-189.

Add more references