Korcz's objections to the future-of-value argument

Journal of Social Philosophy 35 (1):56–60 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-9833.2004.00214.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Douven on Putnam's model-theoretic argument.Byeong D. Lee - 2003 - Erkenntnis 58 (1):7--12.
A critique of “the best secular argument against abortion”.C. Strong - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (10):727-731.
On how to interpret the role of the future within the abortion debate.Ezio Di Nucci - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (10):651-652.
Reply to Di Nucci: why the counterexamples succeed.C. Strong - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):326-327.
Savulescu's objections to the future of value argument.Don Marquis - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (2):119-122.
Temporal Becoming: The Argument From Physics.Lynne Rudder Baker - 1974 - Philosophical Forum 6 (2):218-236.
The argument from design.Robert Hambourger - unknown
The argument from design.R. G. Swinburne - 1968 - Philosophy 43 (165):199 - 212.
A defence of the explanatory argument for physicalism.Jared Bates - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (235):315-324.
Reply to Marquis's "Korcz's objections to the future-of-value argument".Keith Allen Korcz - 2004 - Journal of Social Philosophy 35 (1):61–65.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
87 (#191,942)

6 months
11 (#226,317)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Revisiting the argument from fetal potential.Bertha Alvarez Manninen - 2007 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 2:7.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references