Does the Twin-Earth argument rest on a fallacy of equivocation?

Semiotica 2012 (188):347-356 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Does twin earth rest on a mistake?Katalin Farkas - 2003 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 3 (8):155-169.
Copping out on moral twin earth.Terry Horgan & Mark Timmons - 2000 - Synthese 124 (1-2):139-152.
Moral twin earth: The intuitive argument.Heimir Geirsson - 2003 - Southwest Philosophy Review 19 (1):115-124.
The One Fallacy Theory.Lawrence H. Powers - 1995 - Informal Logic 17 (2).
On equivocation.Tom Stoneham - 2003 - Philosophy 78 (4):515-519.
Can Robert Adams Survive Moral Twin Earth?Luke Taylor - 2016 - Journal of Religious Ethics 44 (2):334-351.
Experimental Philosophy and the Twin Earth Intuition.Max Seeger - 2010 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 80 (1):237-244.
Internal Realism and Twin Earth.Lawrence Pasternack - 2001 - Idealistic Studies 31 (1):73-80.
The Epistemological Bases of the Slow Switching Argument.Mahmoud Morvarid - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy 23 (1):17-38.
Biting the Bullet on Moral Twin Earth.Michael Rubin - 2014 - Philosophical Papers 43 (2):285-309.
Stoljar’s Twin-Physics World.Joseph A. Baltimore - 2013 - Philosophia 41 (1):127-136.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-31

Downloads
34 (#472,683)

6 months
5 (#648,432)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joanna Odrowąż-Sypniewska
University of Warsaw

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references