David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Critical Horizons 11 (3):333-339 (2010)
This paper examines the use of “pleasure” as the distinguishing mark of aesthetic experience in post-Kantian philosophy. It shows how the distinctive features of aesthetic experience, such as pleasure, qualify this experience as a platform for social criticism. The key argument is that the autonomy of the aesthetic experience is not “false”, rather it is paradoxical in the strong sense that the fact of its communicative efficacy, which follows from distinctive, “autonomous” aesthetic features, necessarily loads it with functions and expectations that are external to the aesthetic moment. Kant takes a complicated path to qualify aesthetic judgment as disinterested in order that it may eloquently testify for morality. He thereby sets up the cogency of the modern pattern of looking to aesthetic experience as a locus of meaningful communication for ideas that are experientially poor or remote
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Haewan Lee (2008). Characterizing Aesthetic Experience. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 1:161-167.
Mordechai Gordon (2012). Exploring the Relationship Between Humor and Aesthetic Experience. Journal of Aesthetic Education 46 (1):111-121.
Anthony Graybosch (2002). American Beauty. Acta Analytica 17 (1):133-150.
Derek Matravers (2003). The Aesthetic Experience. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (2):158-174.
Monika Bokiniec (2009). Mieczysław Wallis: Experience and Value. Estetika 46 (1):75-96.
Richard Glauser (2002). Aesthetic Experience in Shaftesbury: Richard Glauser. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 76 (1):25–54.
Jennifer A. McMahon (2011). Critical Aesthetic Realism. Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (2):49-69.
Rolf Reber, Norbert Schwarz & Piotr Winkielman (2004). Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review 8 (4):364-382.
Elisa Galgut (2001). The Poetry and the Pity: Hume's Account of Tragic Pleasure. British Journal of Aesthetics 41 (4):411-424.
Alison Ross (2007). The Aesthetic Paths of Philosophy: Presentation in Kant, Heidegger, Lacoue-Labarthe, and Nancy. Stanford University Press.
Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (1990). The Art of Seeing: An Interpretation of the Aesthetic Encounter. Getty Center for Education in the Arts.
Nick Zangwill (2005). Aesthetic Realism 1. In Jerrold Levinson (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics. OUP Oxford
Jerrold Levinson (1996). The Pleasures of Aesthetics: Philosophical Essays. Cornell University Press.
Michael H. Mitias (ed.) (1988). Aesthetic Quality and Aesthetic Experience. Königshausen & Neumann.
Added to index2011-02-07
Total downloads43 ( #101,934 of 1,934,423 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #195,835 of 1,934,423 )
How can I increase my downloads?