David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 34 (3 & 4):365 – 376 (1991)
Like the positivists, Fuller is concerned to demarcate and systematically evaluate scientific claims and practices. Fuller corrects and reforms the positivist enterprise in light of his sociological naturalism. What Fuller's analysis brings to the fore is how the naturalization of epistemology makes the power?knowledge relation into an epistemological issue. Yet, in his writings. Fuller is radically divided with respect to how to react to this fact. Specifically, Fuller vacillates between, on the one hand, a concern for democratizing norms and, on the other hand, a Machiavellian impulse for the maximization of the norms of knowledge production. I argue that his commitment to being both a democratizer and a Machiavellian is inconsistent, and, moreover, that his argument for democratizing normative pursuits rules out, in fact, his more Machiavellian proclivities regarding how most efficiently to realize the norms of knowledge production
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kenneth Campbell (1983). Fuller on Legal Fictions. Law and Philosophy 2 (3):339 - 370.
Francis Remedios (2003). Legitimizing Scientific Knowledge: An Introduction to Steve Fuller's Social Epistemology. Lexington Books.
Joseph Rouse (1991). Policing Knowledge: Disembodied Policy for Embodied Knowledge. Inquiry 34 (3 & 4):353 – 364.
Kei Yoshida (2009). Review Essay: Sociology as a Political Project: Fuller's Argument Against Bioliberalism. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (1):99-106.
Steve Fuller (2004). The Case of Fuller Vs Kuhn. Social Epistemology 18 (1):3 – 49.
Steve Fuller (1987). On Regulating What is Known: A Way to Social Epistemology. Synthese 73 (1):145 - 183.
Paul Roth (2003). Fuller's '18th Brumaire of Thomas K'. Social Epistemology 17 (2-3):281-289.
Slobodan Perovic (2007). Legitimizing Scientific Knowledge: An Introduction to Steve Fuller's Social Epistemology. Dialogue 46 (3):620-622.
Steve Fuller (1998). Can Knowledge Have a Happy Ending? Social Epistemology 12 (1):89 – 94.
Heidi E. Grasswick (2001). The Normative Failure of Fuller's Social Epistemology. Social Epistemology 16 (2):133 – 148.
Added to index2009-01-30
Total downloads8 ( #473,710 of 1,941,072 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #458,101 of 1,941,072 )
How can I increase my downloads?