David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Foundations of Science 15 (4):357-367 (2010)
I distinguish Nature from the World. I also distinguish development from evolution. Development is progressive change and can be modeled as part of Nature, using a specification hierarchy. I have proposed a ‘canonical developmental trajectory’ of dissipative structures with the stages defined thermodynamically and informationally. I consider some thermodynamic aspects of the Big Bang, leading to a proposal for reviving final cause. This model imposes a ‘hylozooic’ kind of interpretation upon Nature, as all emergent features at higher levels would have been vaguely and episodically present primitively in the lower integrative levels, and were stabilized materially with the developmental emergence of new levels. The specification hierarchy’s form is that of a tree, with its trunk in its lowest level, and so this hierarchy is appropriate for modeling an expanding system like the Universe. It is consistent with this model of differentiation during Big Bang development to view emerging branch tips as having been entrained by multiple finalities because of the top-down integration of the various levels of organization by the higher levels
|Keywords||Big Bang Causality Development Multiple worlds Nature Specification hierarchy Thermodynamics Vagueness|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
D. R. Brooks (1988). Evolution as Entropy: Toward a Unified Theory of Biology. University of Chicago Press.
Mohan Matthen (1989). The Four Causes in Aristotle's Embryology. Apeiron 22 (4):159 - 179.
B. C. O'Neill & Nelson Goodman (1971). Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. Philosophical Quarterly 21 (85):361.
Charles S. Peirce (1905). What Pragmatism Is. The Monist 15 (2):161-181.
Roberto Poli (1998). Levels. Axiomathes 9 (1-2):197-211.
Citations of this work BETA
Stanley N. Salthe (2009). A Hierarchical Framework for Levels of Reality: Understanding Through Representation. [REVIEW] Axiomathes 19 (1):87-99.
Horace Fairlamb (2012). Must Complex Systems Theory Be Materialistic? Foundations of Science 17 (1):1-3.
Gertrudis van de Vijver (2012). Friends of Wisdom? Foundations of Science 17 (1):5-7.
Stanley N. Salthe (2012). Frameworking Ascendency Increase (a Review of R. E. Ulanowicz, A Third Window: Natural Life Beyond Newton and Darwin. Templeton Foundation Press, 2009). [REVIEW] Axiomathes 22 (2):223-230.
Stanley N. Salthe (2009). Inside / Outside. Biosemiotics 2 (2):247-253.
Similar books and articles
William Michael Brown (2002). Development: The Missing Link Between Exaptationist and Adaptationist Accounts of Organismal Design. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):509-510.
Stanley Salthe (2002). Regaining the Riches of Our Past and New Hope for Our Future. World Futures 58 (2 & 3):149 – 157.
J. R. Stone & B. K. Hall (2006). Review Article – a System for Analysing Features in Studies Integrating Ecology, Development, and Evolution. Biology and Philosophy 21 (1):25-40.
Bertram F. Malle (2002). The Relation Between Language and Theory of Mind in Development and Evolution. In Malle, Bertram F. (2002) the Relation Between Language and Theory of Mind in Development and Evolution. [Book Chapter].
Alexander Laszlo (2009). The Nature of Evolution. World Futures 65 (3):204 – 221.
Thomas Pradeu (2010). The Organism in Developmental Systems Theory. Biological Theory 5 (3):216-222.
Andrew A. Fingelkurts & Alexander A. Fingelkurts (2012). Mind as a Nested Operational Architectonics of the Brain. Physics of Life Reviews 9 (1):49-50.
Alexander Rueger & Patrick McGivern (2010). Hierarchies and Levels of Reality. Synthese 176 (3):379 - 397.
John E. Stewart (2010). The Meaning of Life in a Developing Universe. Foundations of Science 15 (4):395-409.
Added to index2010-06-12
Total downloads18 ( #78,273 of 1,088,403 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,601 of 1,088,403 )
How can I increase my downloads?