David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Foundations of Science 15 (4):357-367 (2010)
I distinguish Nature from the World. I also distinguish development from evolution. Development is progressive change and can be modeled as part of Nature, using a specification hierarchy. I have proposed a ‘canonical developmental trajectory’ of dissipative structures with the stages defined thermodynamically and informationally. I consider some thermodynamic aspects of the Big Bang, leading to a proposal for reviving final cause. This model imposes a ‘hylozooic’ kind of interpretation upon Nature, as all emergent features at higher levels would have been vaguely and episodically present primitively in the lower integrative levels, and were stabilized materially with the developmental emergence of new levels. The specification hierarchy’s form is that of a tree, with its trunk in its lowest level, and so this hierarchy is appropriate for modeling an expanding system like the Universe. It is consistent with this model of differentiation during Big Bang development to view emerging branch tips as having been entrained by multiple finalities because of the top-down integration of the various levels of organization by the higher levels
|Keywords||Big Bang Causality Development Multiple worlds Nature Specification hierarchy Thermodynamics Vagueness|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
D. R. Brooks (1988). Evolution as Entropy: Toward a Unified Theory of Biology. University of Chicago Press.
Paul Snowdon (2003). Knowing How and Knowing That: A Distinction Reconsidered. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104 (1):1–29.
Citations of this work BETA
Stanley N. Salthe (2009). A Hierarchical Framework for Levels of Reality: Understanding Through Representation. [REVIEW] Axiomathes 19 (1):87-99.
Horace Fairlamb (2012). Must Complex Systems Theory Be Materialistic? Foundations of Science 17 (1):1-3.
Stanley N. Salthe (2009). Inside / Outside. Biosemiotics 2 (2):247-253.
Stanley N. Salthe (2012). Frameworking Ascendency Increase (a Review of R. E. Ulanowicz, A Third Window: Natural Life Beyond Newton and Darwin. Templeton Foundation Press, 2009). [REVIEW] Axiomathes 22 (2):223-230.
Gertrudis van de Vijver (2012). Friends of Wisdom? Foundations of Science 17 (1):5-7.
Similar books and articles
William Michael Brown (2002). Development: The Missing Link Between Exaptationist and Adaptationist Accounts of Organismal Design. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):509-510.
John E. Stewart (2010). The Meaning of Life in a Developing Universe. Foundations of Science 15 (4):395-409.
Alexander Rueger & Patrick McGivern (2010). Hierarchies and Levels of Reality. Synthese 176 (3):379 - 397.
Andrew A. Fingelkurts & Alexander A. Fingelkurts (2012). Mind as a Nested Operational Architectonics of the Brain. Physics of Life Reviews 9 (1):49-50.
Thomas Pradeu (2010). The Organism in Developmental Systems Theory. Biological Theory 5 (3):216-222.
Alexander Laszlo (2009). The Nature of Evolution. World Futures 65 (3):204 – 221.
Bertram F. Malle (2002). The Relation Between Language and Theory of Mind in Development and Evolution. In Malle, Bertram F. (2002) the Relation Between Language and Theory of Mind in Development and Evolution. [Book Chapter]
J. R. Stone & B. K. Hall (2006). Review Article – a System for Analysing Features in Studies Integrating Ecology, Development, and Evolution. Biology and Philosophy 21 (1):25-40.
Stanley Salthe (2002). Regaining the Riches of Our Past and New Hope for Our Future. World Futures 58 (2 & 3):149 – 157.
Added to index2010-06-12
Total downloads34 ( #127,213 of 1,938,583 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #82,550 of 1,938,583 )
How can I increase my downloads?