David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):890-891 (2004)
Sensation should be understood globally: some infant behaviors do not make sense on the model of separate senses; neonates of all species lack time to learn about the world by triangulating among different senses. Considerations of natural selection favor a global understanding; and the global interpretation is not as opposed to traditional work on sensation as might seem.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Alexander (2000). On Aristotle's "on Sense Perception". Cornell University Press.
Christopher Goodmacher (2007). Partiality and World Poverty. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (2):74-85.
Daniel Alroy (1995). Inner Light. Synthese 104 (1):147-160.
Isabella Muzio (2001). Emotions and Rationality. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):135-145.
Moreland Perkins (1970). Matter, Sensation, and Understanding. American Philosophical Quarterly 8 (1):1-12.
David E. Goldberg, What Engineers Donʼt Learn and Why They Don Learn It: And How Philosophy Might Be Able to Help.
Daniel Heller-Roazen (2007). The Inner Touch: Archaeology of a Sensation. Distributed by the Mit Press.
Davide Panagia (2009). The Political Life of Sensation. Duke University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads42 ( #46,305 of 1,413,271 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #94,880 of 1,413,271 )
How can I increase my downloads?