Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):890-891 (2004)
|Abstract||Sensation should be understood globally: some infant behaviors do not make sense on the model of separate senses; neonates of all species lack time to learn about the world by triangulating among different senses. Considerations of natural selection favor a global understanding; and the global interpretation is not as opposed to traditional work on sensation as might seem.|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alexander (2000). On Aristotle's "on Sense Perception". Cornell University Press.
Christopher Goodmacher (2007). Partiality and World Poverty. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (2):74-85.
Daniel Alroy (1995). Inner Light. Synthese 104 (1):147-160.
Isabella Muzio (2001). Emotions and Rationality. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):135-145.
Moreland Perkins (1970). Matter, Sensation, and Understanding. American Philosophical Quarterly 8 (1):1-12.
David E. Goldberg, What Engineers Donʼt Learn and Why They Don Learn It: And How Philosophy Might Be Able to Help.
Daniel Heller-Roazen (2007). The Inner Touch: Archaeology of a Sensation. Distributed by the Mit Press.
Davide Panagia (2009). The Political Life of Sensation. Duke University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #35,831 of 722,838 )
Recent downloads (6 months)14 ( #8,818 of 722,838 )
How can I increase my downloads?