David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Education 8 (5):457-488 (1999)
Debate has been growing in developmental psychology over how much the cognitive development of children is like theory change in science. Useful debate on this topic requires a clear understanding of what it would be for a child to have a theory. I argue that existing accounts of theories within philosophy of science and developmental psychology either are less precise than is ideal for the task or cannot capture everyday theorizing of the sort that children, if they theorize, must do. I then propose an account of theories that ties theories and explanation very closely together, treating theories primarily as products of a drive to explain. I clarify some of the positions people have taken regarding the "theory theory" of development, and I concl.ude by proposing that psychologists interested in the 'theory theory' look for patterns of affect and arousal in development that would accompany the existence of a drive to explain
|Keywords||Childhood Attitudes Epistemology Psychology Science Education Theories|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Bill Wringe (2011). Cognitive Individualism and the Child as Scientist Program. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 42 (4):518-529.
Similar books and articles
Jeremy I. M. Carpendale & Charlie Lewis (2004). Constructing an Understanding of Mind: The Development of Children's Social Understanding Within Social Interaction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):79-96.
Leonard Kahn (2011). Conflict, Regret, and Modern Moral Philosophy. In Thom Brooks (ed.), New Waves in Ethics.
Francis Schrag (2004). Children and Democracy: Theory and Policy. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (3):365-379.
Alison Gopnik (1997). The Scientist as Child. Philosophy of Science 63 (4):485-514.
Eva Johansson (2001). Morality in Children's Worlds Â Rationality of Thought or Values Emanating From Relations? Studies in Philosophy and Education 20 (4):345-358.
Margaret J. Haefner (1991). Ethical Problems of Advertising to Children. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 6 (2):83 – 92.
Peter Carruthers (1996). Autism as Mindblindness: An Elaboration and Partial Defence. In Peter Carruthers & Peter K. Smith (eds.), Theories of Theories of Mind. Cambridge University Press. 257.
Alison Gopnik (1990). Developing the Idea of Intentionality: Children's Theories of Mind. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20 (1):89-114.
Eric Schwitzgebel (1996). Theories in Children and the Rest of Us. Philosophy of Science Association 3 (3):S202-S210.
Alison Gopnik (1998). Explanation as Orgasm. Minds and Machines 8 (1):101-118.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #95,283 of 1,089,063 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,801 of 1,089,063 )
How can I increase my downloads?