Realm Between Immanent and Transcendent: Philosophy of K. Satchidananda Murty

Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 32 (1):45-58 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The present paper is an attempt to develop late Professor K. Satchidananda Murty’s quest to articulate Immanent and Transcendent in his philosophical journey from Upanishads to German idealism and Marxism. It is proposed to be achieved by explicating Murty’s understanding of the views of Kant, Hegel, Feuerbach, and Marx on human condition and its transcendence or emancipation. For this purpose, I will discuss consciousness as the ultimate reality being transcendent and immanent in Vedanta as well as in German idealism. The ambition and challenge of the present article is to pursue Murty’s cross-cultural perspective to the extent that the ideas of thinkers of very different traditions, especially culturally and intellectually distinct traditions, are contested on the fullness of thought concerning immanent and transcendent as is evident in comparing Sankara, Kant, and Hegel on consciousness in relation to Buddha and Marx on suffering and alienation. Whereas Murty refers to them, from cross-cultural perspective, with limited end to substantiate his position on the “realm between” derived from Upanishads and Vedanta infused with Buddhism, I wish to present, from the same perspective, some clarifications, annotations, and summations from German idealism and Marxism, which may be useful for expanding Murty’s preliminary acquaintance with them. I wish to argue that though there is antithetical nature of these perspectives, yet the distinctions between immanent and transcendent have been one of the fundamental conceptual linkages under different cultural background.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Transcendent Creativity.Lewis S. Ford - 2013 - Process Studies 42 (1):20-46.
Form and Universal in Boethius.Richard Cross - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (3):439-458.
The Immanent and the Transcendent in Husserl's Cartesian Meditations.Melville Juliand Stratton - 1970 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo
The dialectic of the immanent and the transcendent.James E. Hansen - 1972 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 32 (4):543-547.
Immanent and transcendent approaches to the theory of meaning.Gilbert Harman - 1990 - In Roger Gibson & Robert B. Barrett (eds.), Perspectives on Quine. Blackwell.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-28

Downloads
13 (#1,032,575)

6 months
3 (#965,065)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

R. P. Singh
Jawaharlal Nehru University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Critique of Pure Reason.I. Kant - 1787/1998 - Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.
Phenomenology of Spirit.G. W. F. Hegel & A. V. Miller - 1977 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10 (4):268-271.
Lectures on the philosophy of religion.Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel - 1984 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Peter Crafts Hodgson.
Hegel and modern society.Charles Taylor - 1979 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 6 references / Add more references