David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Asian Philosophy 9 (2):123 – 133 (1999)
This, paper argues that the debate between Mencius and Xunzi, as to whether human nature is intrinsically good or evil, represents not so much a disagreement as to the empirical facts of human nature as a disagreement over the nature of morality. Specifically, it argues that Mencius holds a virtue-theoretic conception of morality while Xunzi subscribes to a rule-based conception of morality. These differences in their conceptions of morality lead the two philosophers to radically different evaluations of human nature although they are in substantial agreement as to the empirical facts of human nature.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
David E. Soles (1995). Confucius and the Role of Reason. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 22 (3):249-261.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Maurizio Scarpari (2003). The Debate on Human Nature in Early Confucian Literature. Philosophy East and West 53 (3):323-339.
Tao Liang (2009). Mencius and the Tradition of Articulating Human Nature in Terms of Growth. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (2):180-197.
Shu-hsien Liu & Kwong-loi Shun (1996). Some Reflections on Mencius' Views of Mind-Heart and Human Nature. Philosophy East and West 46 (2):143-164.
Jiyuan Yu (2006). Human Nature and Virtue in Mencius and Xunzi: An Aristotelian Interpretation. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 5 (1):11-30.
Yu Jiyuan (2005). Human Nature and Virtue in Mencius and Xunzi: An Aristotelian Interpretation. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 5 (1):11-30.
Yiu-Ming Fung 馮耀明 (2012). Two Senses of “Wei 偽”: A New Interpretation of Xunzi's Theory of Human Nature. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 11 (2):187-200.
Youguang Li (2010). The True or the Artificial: Theories on Human Nature Before Mencius and Xunzi-Based on “ Sheng is From Ming , and Ming is From Tian ”. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (1):31-50.
Katrin Froese (2008). Organic Virtue: Reading Mencius with Rousseau. Asian Philosophy 18 (1):83 – 104.
Kim Chong Chong (2003). Xunzi's Systematic Critique of Mencius. Philosophy East and West 53 (2):215-233.
Added to index2009-02-01
Total downloads44 ( #108,433 of 1,932,537 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #456,270 of 1,932,537 )
How can I increase my downloads?