Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (3):307-323 (2005)
|Abstract||This article will discuss the difficulties of providing a plausible account of rule following in the social realm. It will show that the cognitive model of rule following is not suited for this task. Nevertheless, revealing the inadequacy of the cognitive model does not justify the wholesale dismissal of understanding human practices as rule-following practices, as social theorists like Bourdieu or Dreyfus have argued. Instead it will be shown that rule-following behavior is best understood as being based on a set of complex dispositions. In this manner one is able to account for the causal explanatory role of the notion of a rule. Key Words: rules norms explanation Bourdieu Winch.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ben Eggleston (2007). Conflicts of Rules in Hooker's Rule-Consequentialism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (3):329-349.
Cyrus Panjvani (2008). Rule-Following, Explanation-Transcendence, and Private Language. Mind 117 (466):303-328.
Mark McCullagh (2002). Wittgenstein on Rules and Practices. Journal of Philosophical Research 27:83-100.
Anne Ruth Mackor (1998). Rules Are Laws: An Argument Against Holism. Philosophical Explorations 1 (3):215 – 232.
J. Hage (2000). Rule Consistency. Law and Philosophy 19 (3):369-390.
Lorenzo Bernasconi-Kohn (2006). How Not to Think About Rules and Rule Following: A Response to Stueber. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (1):86-94.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads34 ( #40,597 of 739,304 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,304 )
How can I increase my downloads?