Asimov's “three laws of robotics” and machine metaethics
AI and Society 22 (4):477-493 (2007)
| Abstract | Using Asimovâs Bicentennial Man as a springboard, a number of metaethical issues concerning the emerging field of machine ethics are discussed. Although the ultimate goal of machine ethics is to create autonomous ethical machines, this presents a number of challenges. A good way to begin the task of making ethics computable is to create a program that enables a machine to act an ethical advisor to human beings. This project, unlike creating an autonomous ethical machine, will not require that we make a judgment about the ethical status of the machine itself, a judgment that will be particularly difficult to make. Finally, it is argued that Asimovâs three laws of robotics are an unsatisfactory basis for machine ethics, regardless of the status of the machine | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Michael Anderson & Susan Leigh Anderson (2007). The Status of Machine Ethics: A Report From the AAAI Symposium. Minds and Machines 17 (1).
Ryan Tonkens (2009). A Challenge for Machine Ethics. Minds and Machines 19 (3):421-438.
Karim Jebari (forthcoming). Brain Machine Interface and Human Enhancement – An Ethical Review. Neuroethics.
Ryan Tonkens (2012). Out of Character: On the Creation of Virtuous Machines. Ethics and Information Technology 14 (2):137-149.
Antonio Chella & Riccardo Manzotti (2009). Machine Consciousness: A Manifesto for Robotics. International Journal of Machine Consciousness 1 (01):33-51.
Lee McCauley (2007). AI Armageddon and the Three Laws of Robotics. Ethics and Information Technology 9 (2).
Peter Danielson (forthcoming). Designing a Machine to Learn About the Ethics of Robotics: The N-Reasons Platform. Ethics and Information Technology.
Andreas Matthias (2004). The Responsibility Gap: Ascribing Responsibility for the Actions of Learning Automata. Ethics and Information Technology 6 (3).
Guglielmo Tamburrini & Edoardo Datteri (2005). Machine Experiments and Theoretical Modelling: From Cybernetic Methodology to Neuro-Robotics. Minds and Machines 15 (3-4).
Hiroshi Ishiguro (2006). Android Science: Conscious and Subconscious Recognition. Connection Science 18 (4):319-332.
Dan Weijers (forthcoming). Nozick’s Experience Machine is Dead, Long Live the Experience Machine! Philosophical Psychology.
Jae-Joon Lee (2008). An Experience of Machine-Based Images by the Autonomy of Computing System. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 12:47-54.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-30Total downloads55 ( #18,310 of 549,122 )Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,263 of 549,122 )How can I increase my downloads? |

