Covert video surveillance: the Staffordshire Protocol--a response to Dr Shinebourne

Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (6):349-351 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is a response to Dr Shinebourne's response to my recent paper assessing the relative merits of the Staffordshire Protocol on covert video surveillance. Dr Shinebourne does not take the opportunity to rebut the criticisms made of the text of the protocol. It is further suggested that judicial oversight of the use of CVS might accord the process a degree of proportionality

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Covert video surveillance continues to provoke debate.E. A. Shinebourne - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (6):351-351.
Reply to Dr. Evans re covert video surveillance.D. P. Southall & M. P. Samuels - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (1):32-32.
Trust, Covert Surveillance and Fiduciary Obligations.Wayne Vaught - 2003 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 10 (1):87-92.
Are Video Games Art?Aaron Smuts - 2005 - Contemporary Aesthetics 3.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
41 (#383,335)

6 months
6 (#509,020)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references