David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 47 (4):380 – 412 (2004)
The idea inspiring the eco-phenomenological movement is that phenomenology can help remedy our environmental crisis by uprooting and replacing environmentally-destructive ethical and metaphysical presuppositions inherited from modern philosophy. Eco-phenomenology's critiques of subject/object dualism and the fact/value divide are sketched and its positive alternatives examined. Two competing approaches are discerned within the eco-phenomenological movement: Nietzscheans and Husserlians propose a naturalistic ethical realism in which good and bad are ultimately matters of fact, and values should be grounded in these proto-ethical facts; Heideggerians and Levinasians articulate a transcendental ethical realism according to which we discover what really matters when we are appropriately open to the environment, but what we thereby discover is a transcendental source of meaning that cannot be reduced to facts, values, or entities of any kind. These two species of ethical realism generate different kinds of ethical perfectionism: naturalistic ethical realism yields an eco-centric perfectionism which stresses the flourishing of life in general; transcendental ethical realism leads to a more 'humanistic' perfectionism which emphasizes the cultivation of distinctive traits of Dasein. Both approaches are examined, and the Heideggerian strand of the humanistic approach defended, since it approaches the best elements of the eco-centric view while avoiding its problematic ontological assumptions and anti-humanistic implications.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Brendan Mahoney (2016). The Virtue of Burden and Limits of Gelassenheit. Environmental Philosophy 13 (2):269-298.
Similar books and articles
Seamus Carey (2004). Eco-Phenomenology: Back to the Earth. Environmental Ethics 26 (3):327-330.
Roger J. H. King (2003). The Place of Domesticated Spaces in Environmental Ethics. Social Philosophy Today 19:41-53.
David Wood (2001). What is Ecophenomenology? Research in Phenomenology 31 (1):78-95.
Anne Marie Todd (2004). The Aesthetic Turn in Green Marketing: Environmental Consumer Ethics of Natural Personal Care Products. Ethics and the Environment 9 (2):86-102.
Noel Castree (2003). A Post-Environmental Ethics? Ethics, Place and Environment 6 (1):3 – 12.
Jim Cheney (1987). Eco-Feminism and Deep Ecology. Environmental Ethics 9 (2):115-145.
Simon Kirchin (2003). Ethical Phenomenology and Metaethics. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (3):241-264.
Josef Seifert (1987). Back to Things in Themselves: A Phenomenological Foundation for Classical Realism: A Thematic Study Into the Epistemological-Metaphysical Foundations of Phenomenological Realism, a Reformulation of the Method of Phenomenology as Noumenology, a Critique of Subjectivist Transcendental Philosophy and Phenomenology. Routledge & K. Paul.
John Mizzoni (2003). Environ-Moral Realism. Journal of Philosophical Research 28:191-221.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads43 ( #110,515 of 1,940,983 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #333,940 of 1,940,983 )
How can I increase my downloads?