David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Asian Philosophy 15 (3):231 – 246 (2005)
Over the last several years, there has been a growing controversy about whether Yogacara Buddhism can be said to be idealist in some sense, as used to be commonly thought by earlier scholars. In this paper, I first clarify the different senses of idealism that might be pertinent to the debate. I then focus on some of the works of Vasubandhu, limiting myself to his Vimsatika, Trimsika, and Trisvabhavanirdesa. I argue that classical Yogacara Buddhism, at least as found in these works of Vasubandhu, is closer to epistemic rather than metaphysical idealism or absolute idealism, as I understand these. However, there are undoubtedly some important differences between Vasubandhu's Yogacara and Western epistemic idealism that cast doubt on the idea that Yogacara is simply to be lumped together with Western epistemic idealism.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Immanuel Kant (1998). Critique of Pure Reason (Translated and Edited by Paul Guyer & Allen W. Wood). Cambridge.
I. Kant (1787/1998). Critique of Pure Reason. Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.
Jay L. Garfield (2002). Empty Words: Buddhist Philosophy and Cross-Cultural Interpretation. Oxford University Press.
George Berkeley (1998). Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous. Oxford University Press.
Saam Trivedi (2001). An Epistemic Dilemma for Actual Intentionalism. British Journal of Aesthetics 41 (2):192-206.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Review author[S.]: Alex Wayman (1965). The Yogācāra Idealism. Philosophy East and West 15 (1):65-73.
Adam Scarfe (2006). Hegelian 'Absolute Idealism' with Yogācāra Buddhism on Consciousness, Concept ( Begriff ), and Co-Dependent Origination ( Pratītyasamutpāda ). Contemporary Buddhism 7 (1):47-73.
Jay L. Garfield (1997). Vasubandhu's Treatise on the Three Natures Translated From the Tibetan Edition with a Commentary. Asian Philosophy 7 (2):133 – 154.
Alex Wayman (1996). A Defense of Yogācāra Buddhism. Philosophy East and West 46 (4):447-476.
Vasubandhu (1939). The Trisvabhāvanirdeśa of Vasubandhu. Visvabharati.
Dan Lusthaus (2003). Buddhist Phenomenology: A Philosophical Investigation of Yogācāra Buddhism and the Chʼeng Wei-Shih Lun. Routledgecurzon.
Ornan Rotem (1993). Vasubandhu's Idealism: An Encounter Between Philosophy and Religion. Asian Philosophy 3 (1):15 – 28.
Lambert Schmithausen (1987). Ālayavijñāna: On the Origin and the Early Development of a Central Concept of Yogācāra Philosophy: Reprint with Addenda and Corrigenda. International Institute for Buddhist Studies of the International College for Postgraduate Buddhist Studies.
Ashok Kumar Chatterjee (1962). The Yogācāra Idealism. Varanasi, Banaras Hindu University.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads89 ( #50,490 of 1,938,813 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #219,228 of 1,938,813 )
How can I increase my downloads?